What are the differences between the 2017 Passat 300 and 330?

[LaEmiliano]

The differences between the 2017 Passat 300 and 330 are as follows: 1. Different engines: The Passat 300 uses the second-generation EA888 engine, while the 330 uses the third-generation EA888 engine. 2. Different power outputs: (1) The Passat 300 is equipped with a 1.8T inline 4-cylinder turbocharged low-power version, paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission, with a maximum power of 118kw, maximum horsepower of 160ps, and maximum torque of 250N·m. The maximum power RPM range is 51006000rpm, and the maximum torque RPM range is 17005000rpm. (2) The Passat 330 is equipped with a 1.8T inline 4-cylinder turbocharged high-power version, paired with a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission, with a maximum power of 132kw, maximum horsepower of 180ps, and maximum torque of 300N·m. The maximum power RPM range is 43006250rpm, and the maximum torque RPM range is 14504100rpm.

[WilliamDella]

I've driven the 2017 Passat 330 and also test-drove the 300 version. The biggest difference lies in the powertrain. The 330 is equipped with a 2.0L turbocharged engine delivering around 180 horsepower, offering rapid acceleration, excellent highway stability, and strong back-push sensation - perfect for driving enthusiasts. The 300 version has a smaller engine (approximately 1.8L or 1.4L) with 150 horsepower output, featuring slower starts but better fuel efficiency (saving 1-2L per 100km). The 330 boasts more premium interior with standard leather seats, navigation system, and advanced driving assists including effective adaptive cruise control. The 300 has more basic configurations with similar cabin space but noticeable plastic textures. Their chassis tuning differs too: the 330 has better suspension support for agile handling, while the 300 prioritizes comfort but shows body roll in corners. With a price gap of several ten thousand yuan, I'd recommend the 330 for sufficient budgets, while the 300 proves more economical for daily commutes. Maintenance costs over years are comparable - both share replaceable components like oil filters and spark plugs.

[KalebLynn]

As a car enthusiast, the engine difference between the Passat 330 and 300 is quite obvious. The 330 comes with a 2.0T engine, delivering around 180 horsepower, with quick turbo response—zooming off at traffic lights and effortlessly overtaking trucks. The 300, equipped with a 1.8T or 1.4T, outputs just over 150 horsepower, offering smooth but sluggish acceleration, struggling when revs don’t climb high. In terms of fuel consumption, the 330 averages 10-11L/100km, while the 300 is more economical at 8-9L. The 330’s chassis is sportier, providing rock-solid stability in corners, whereas the 300 is softer, more comfortable on bumpy roads but feels floaty at high speeds. In terms of features, the 330 comes standard with LED headlights and lane-keeping assist, while the 300 may have halogen lights and fewer driver aids. The 330 has greater tuning potential—a simple ECU remap can push it past 200 horsepower—while the 300 faces more limitations. For daily driving, the 330 is more thrilling, perfect for driving enthusiasts, while the 300 is more economical, a solid choice for entry-level buyers.

[DelHailey]

When I was comparing these two used cars before buying, the 330 has strong power but higher fuel consumption, costing a few hundred more in monthly fuel expenses, making it suitable for those who frequently drive on highways or travel often. The 300 is economical and practical, with a 1.8-liter engine that saves fuel and is sufficient for city driving, though it accelerates slowly and struggles when carrying family members uphill. Both cars have the same spacious interior, making them roomy for family use. In terms of maintenance, the cost of parts like fuel pumps and spark plugs is similar, but the 330 wears out tires and brakes faster. In the long run, the 330 retains its value better for a few more years, while the 300 is cheaper to buy by 10,000 to 20,000 yuan, making it a cost-effective choice for those on a tight budget. Driving habits determine the choice—I chose the 300 for peace of mind, saving on fuel costs for daily commutes.

[GageLynn]

The 330 version comes with more abundant configurations, such as automatic air conditioning and adaptive cruise control as standard, making long-distance driving effortless with automatic speed control and excellent noise reduction for a quiet cabin; the 300 might only have basic manual air conditioning and fewer assistive features. In terms of interior materials, the 330 features leather seats with fine edging, while the 300 may have fabric seats that are prone to staining. The safety system is a highlight, with the 330 offering multiple airbags and automatic braking, scoring high in crash tests; the 300 has basic safety features but lacks assistive functions. The power difference is noticeable, with the 330 having quick throttle response for easy overtaking, while the 300 feels slightly sluggish. The driving experience of the 330 is overall refined and comfortable, whereas the 300 is simpler and more practical, suitable for those not pursuing details. In terms of space design, both cars have the same rear legroom, with the 330 offering slightly more storage in the center console.

[StBrielle]

For a family needing a spacious and safe car, the 330 offers good power and a reassuring drive, making highway overtaking of trucks effortless, with solid suspension that ensures a smooth ride when taking kids out. The 300 has weaker power, requiring a heavy foot on the throttle when going uphill with a full load, but its fuel consumption is indeed lower, making it suitable for daily commuting. Both cars offer the same spaciousness, with ample legroom in the front and rear seats, and a trunk that can fit a stroller. Their safety configurations are similar, with the same number of airbags, but the 330 comes with blind-spot monitoring for added peace of mind. Maintenance costs are about the same, with tires and brakes being interchangeable. In the long run, the 330 holds its value better and offers more driving pleasure; the 300 is a more affordable entry-level option that doesn’t disappoint. I recommend the 300 for those on a tight budget as it’s sufficient for their needs.