What are the differences between Mazda CX-4 and CX-30?

[VanPeter]

The differences between Mazda CX-4 and CX-30: 1. Different body dimensions: CX-4 has a length of 4637mm, width of 1855mm, height of 1855mm, and wheelbase of 2700mm; CX-30 has a length of 4395mm, width of 1797mm, height of 1545mm, and wheelbase of 2653mm. 2. Different powertrain configurations: CX-4 is equipped with 2.0L and 2.5L engines; CX-30 is equipped with a 2.0L engine. In terms of interior design, CX-30 has a stronger design sense. Both CX-4 and CX-30 adhere to the Japanese minimalist design philosophy, presenting an overall simple style. The CX-30's center console treatment is more concise, and its air vent design is more concealed.

[LaLeo]

I've recently driven both models, with the main differences lying in design and platform. The CX-4 is Mazda's coupe-style SUV, featuring a lower and sleeker body with a fastback-like design. It delivers strong sporty driving dynamics, making it ideal for young people pursuing fashion, though the interior space is somewhat cramped with limited rear headroom. The CX-30, built on the new Skyactiv architecture, has a more rounded and modern design with softer lines and more precise handling. Its interior incorporates the latest materials and tech screens. Price-wise, the CX-4 often has promotions making it cheaper, but its technology is outdated; the CX-30 is slightly more expensive but more fuel-efficient. If you prefer spirited driving, the CX-4 is a good choice, but if you prioritize overall comfort and technology, the CX-30 is the better option. For long-term use, I recommend the CX-30 as it adapts well to various road conditions.

[DiLily]

As a frequent driver, I think the CX-4 and CX-30 differ in practicality and efficiency. The CX-4 is slightly larger in size, but its trunk space is only about 350 liters, and rear passengers may feel uncomfortable during long rides due to the low roofline design, making entry and exit less convenient. The CX-30 is more compact, with a trunk capacity of approximately 430 liters, offering better space optimization for luggage or shopping. In terms of fuel consumption, the CX-30 averages 6-7 liters per 100 kilometers, benefiting from its newer, more fuel-efficient platform, while the CX-4 has slightly higher fuel consumption. Price-wise, the CX-4 is more affordable, but the CX-30 comes with more active safety features like blind-spot monitoring, making commuting safer. If you prioritize daily convenience and cost-effectiveness, the CX-30 is worth the extra investment, as it delivers a more balanced overall performance.

[VanMolly]

From a family perspective, there's a significant difference in space and comfort between the CX-4 and CX-30. The CX-4's fastback design makes the rear seats cramped, with kids easily bumping their heads against the roof, and the trunk space is smaller. The CX-30, on the other hand, has a more practical design with ample legroom in the back, moderately firm seats that are comfortable, and easy installation of child seats. In terms of safety, the CX-30 comes standard with driver assistance systems, making reversing less stressful. While both have adequate power, the CX-30 offers better noise insulation, making long drives less tiring. Overall, the CX-30 is the more suitable choice for families.