What are the differences between Mazda CX-30 and CX-5?
4 Answers
Mazda CX-30 and CX-5 differences: 1. Different body dimensions: The CX-30 measures 4395mm in length, 1797mm in width, and 1545mm in height; the CX-5 measures 4555mm in length, 1842mm in width, and 1685mm in height. 2. Different powertrains: The CX-30 is equipped with a 2.0L naturally aspirated engine; the CX-5 offers two engine options, a 2.0L naturally aspirated engine and a 2.5L naturally aspirated engine. The CX-30's 2.0L naturally aspirated engine delivers a maximum power of 155 horsepower and a maximum torque of 200 Nm, with the maximum power achieved at 6000 rpm and maximum torque at 4000 rpm, paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission. The CX-5's 2.5L naturally aspirated engine produces a maximum power of 196 horsepower and a maximum torque of 252 Nm, with the maximum power achieved at 6100 rpm and maximum torque at 4000 rpm, also paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission.
I think the main differences between the CX-30 and CX-5 lie in body size and practical space. The CX-30 has a more compact design, resembling a raised hatchback, with a smaller trunk. Sitting three people in the back seat can feel a bit cramped, but it's super convenient for parking in the city—perfect for my daily commute to work. The CX-5, on the other hand, is much larger, fitting into the standard compact SUV category. Rear passengers have more legroom, and it can easily accommodate large luggage or camping gear, making it ideal for family trips. Both models feature Mazda's SkyActiv technology, offering similarly efficient power, but the CX-5 feels more stable on the road with less body roll on bumpy surfaces. I'd recommend the CX-30 for singles or urban commuting, while the CX-5 is better for those with greater space needs. Additionally, both come well-equipped with safety features, though the CX-5 might offer more active safety options. Overall, choosing between them depends on your lifestyle—you can't go wrong either way.
From a price and configuration perspective, based on my personal experience, the CX-30 generally has a lower starting price, with its entry-level model being more affordable, making it suitable for budget-conscious young buyers purchasing their first car. The CX-5 costs a few thousand more, but offers a more premium interior with standard features like heated seats and a panoramic sunroof, providing good value for money. Both models come equipped with Mazda's i-Activsense safety system, but the CX-5 may include more driver-assistance features such as blind-spot monitoring. Fuel efficiency differences are minimal—the CX-30 is slightly more economical in city driving due to its lighter weight, while the CX-5 offers better comfort on long trips at the cost of slightly higher fuel consumption. I recommend test-driving both to see which one feels better to drive before making a decision. If you prioritize value for money and don’t need much space, the CX-30 is sufficient; if you want more comfort for family trips, it’s worth spending extra on the CX-5.
In terms of driving experience, the CX-30 offers more agile handling with lighter steering that feels like a compact car, making it exhilarating when taking corners. The CX-5 has a more stable chassis, providing a firmer ride at high speeds but with slightly less dynamism. Both share similar powertrains, though the CX-30's suspension tuning is sportier, making it more nimble for city driving. The CX-5, being larger and heavier, feels a bit floaty but excels at filtering out bumps and reducing noise, making it better suited for long-distance travel. Interior space-wise, the CX-5 has a more spacious rear seat, accommodating child seats without feeling cramped, while the CX-30's rear seats are tighter and can feel crowded with multiple passengers. For driving enthusiasts who prioritize daily fun, I'd recommend the CX-30. For those needing to transport children or elderly family members, the CX-5 is the more practical choice. Both models are reliable with no major issues—just stick to regular maintenance.
