What are the differences between Mazda CX-30 and CX-5?
4 Answers
Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 differ in three aspects: body size, configuration, and power output. The following are detailed explanations: Body Size: The latest top-end version of the Mazda CX-30 has a body length, width, and height of 4395(mm) x 1797(mm) x 1545(mm), with a wheelbase of 2653(mm). The latest top-end version of the Mazda CX-5 has a body length, width, and height of 4555(mm) x 1842(mm) x 1685(mm), with a wheelbase of 2700(mm). Overall Configuration: The top-end version of the Mazda CX-5 has richer configurations compared to the top-end version of the Mazda CX-30. Power Output: The Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a 2.0L naturally aspirated engine, paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission; the Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a 2.5L naturally aspirated engine, paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission.
As a user who frequently travels with children, I find the CX-5 more suitable for family life. It has a larger body and a spacious trunk, easily accommodating strollers or luggage. The rear seats offer ample legroom, making long trips with kids comfortable. The CX-30 is a small crossover SUV with a stylish design, but its rear seats are smaller, making it a bit cramped for three people. On the highway, the CX-5 offers higher stability, less bumpiness, and more safety features. Both have a 2.5L naturally aspirated engine, but the CX-5 also offers a turbocharged option for more powerful starts. If the budget allows, choosing the CX-5 is more worry-free, as family vehicles must prioritize practicality and comfort.
Young drivers like me prefer the CX-30—it feels light and agile, making city driving a breeze with its nimble handling. The styling is trendier, with a sharp front end and a clean, modern interior. The seats offer great support, keeping you comfortable even on long drives. The CX-5 is a bit larger, sacrificing some driving excitement for more stability at highway speeds. The powertrain feels similar, and both deliver around 30 mpg in fuel efficiency. If you want a sportier driving experience, the CX-30 delivers plenty of fun while saving you thousands upfront. Plus, it’s easier to park—don’t overlook its great value!
On a tight budget, I chose the CX-30, which starts about $5,000 cheaper than the CX-5 and comes with all the essential features. The space is sufficient for daily commuting, fuel efficiency is similar, and maintenance costs don’t differ much. The CX-5’s higher price is justified by its larger space and extra features, but for someone living alone like me, it’s unnecessary. I recommend test-driving both to compare and avoid spending extra on space you don’t need.
