What are the differences between Lincoln Continental and MKZ?

[AnthonyFitz]

The differences between Lincoln Continental and MKZ lie in their body dimensions: the Continental measures 5115mm in length, 1912mm in width, and 1492mm in height; the MKZ measures 4925mm in length, 1864mm in width, and 1477mm in height. The Lincoln Continental is a prestigious luxury model first introduced by Lincoln Mercury. In terms of power, the Lincoln Continental is equipped with two engines: a 2.0-liter turbocharged engine and a 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged engine. For the suspension system, the Lincoln Continental features a MacPherson strut independent front suspension and a multi-link independent rear suspension.

[EmilyRose]

The Lincoln Continental and MKZ are both excellent cars from Lincoln, but I noticed significant differences after driving them. The Continental seems more tailored for business executives—its body is large and elongated, offering rear legroom so spacious you can cross your legs comfortably, making it ideal for long business trips or chauffeuring clients. The ride is so smooth it feels like sitting on a sofa. In contrast, the MKZ is much more agile, with a smaller footprint that makes turning and parking in tight spots effortless. Its driving dynamics are sportier, especially when cornering without hesitation, suiting daily commuters like me. Material-wise, the Continental is more upscale, featuring standard leather seats, while the MKZ opts for simplicity, reflecting in their price gap—the Continental starts several tens of thousands higher, exuding more prestige when new. Fuel efficiency favors the MKZ; the Continental’s heft naturally demands more gas. Though both are now discontinued, for used car buyers, the Continental suits those prioritizing comfort, whereas the MKZ is the practical choice.

[SanElisa]

From a driving performance perspective, the differences between the Continental and MKZ are quite noticeable. The Continental typically offers more robust power, with its V6 engine delivering highway cruising that feels as smooth as gliding. Its acceleration isn't aggressive but provides ample strength, and the soft suspension effectively filters out bumps. The MKZ, on the other hand, has sporty genes, offering an optional turbocharged version that delivers quick throttle response. When switched to sport mode, the steering becomes firmer, enhancing driving fun and making it more convenient for weaving through city traffic. Their differing sizes affect the driving experience—the Continental feels heavier and requires more caution when cornering, while the MKZ is lighter with more responsive steering. I've tested the MKZ on mountain roads and found it more agile. Maintenance costs are slightly higher for the Continental, with brake pads wearing out faster, while MKZ parts are relatively easier to find. Both models come with similar safety features like automatic emergency braking, but the Continental offers more tech options such as adaptive cruise control. Overall, the MKZ suits younger drivers who enjoy a sporty feel, while the Continental leans toward mature drivers who prefer a stable and comfortable ride.

[Deborah]

Design-wise, the Lincoln Continental and MKZ are completely different in style. The Continental features a boxy, classic silhouette with sharp, bold lines that exude presence. Its front grille resembles a large shield, and the flat, dignified rear end gives it a commanding road presence that turns heads even when parked. The MKZ embraces a coupe-like design with a sleek, fastback profile and a trendy full-width taillight setup, catering to younger buyers seeking a more avant-garde look. Space differs significantly—the Continental's longer wheelbase offers over two fists of rear legroom, comfortably seating three, while its trunk swallows multiple large suitcases. The MKZ is more compact, with slightly tighter rear quarters and less cargo capacity, though adequate for daily shopping. Inside, the Continental pampers with wood and metal trim, whereas the MKZ opts for a simpler, more plastic-heavy aesthetic. Fuel efficiency favors the MKZ, and its smaller footprint eases parking—navigating narrow alleys in the Continental requires extra caution. Lighting-wise, the MKZ comes standard with LEDs, while the Continental offers optional matrix headlights. Both models are now discontinued, so when browsing the used market, prioritizing design preference and size will steer you right.

[SanJayden]

From the perspective of price and practicality, there is a significant gap between the Continental and MKZ. The starting price of a new Continental is 50,000 to 60,000 yuan higher, with more luxurious configurations such as optional massage seats. Maintenance costs are also higher, with a major service costing over a thousand yuan more. The MKZ offers better value for money, with its entry-level version being fuel-efficient and having lower daily expenses, plus longer maintenance intervals that save money. In terms of driving costs, the Continental consumes on average two to three more liters of fuel per 100 km, and its annual insurance premium is slightly higher, making the MKZ more economical and suitable for salaried workers. In terms of space and practicality, the Continental's rear seats can serve as a mobile office, while the MKZ is better suited for small families' daily commutes. Reliability-wise, both have similar rates of minor mechanical issues, but the Continental's more complex electronic systems can be troublesome to repair. In terms of used car value retention, the Continental fares slightly better due to its brand history, while the MKZ depreciates faster. From a practical standpoint, the MKZ is easier to handle and park quickly, whereas the Continental requires a larger parking space. Overall, the choice depends on budget—the Continental is suitable for those with deep pockets, while the MKZ is the optimal choice for those who are budget-conscious.