
Here are the differences between ID.4X and ID.4 CROZZ: 1. Exterior: Both models feature a closed grille design, with a continuous LED daytime running light strip connecting the left and right headlights, and both logos can illuminate. The differences lie in the headlight and front bumper designs. From the side view, both share characteristics like a two-tone body, hidden door handles, and silver trim strips on the front fenders and front doors. However, the ID.4X has a slightly more protruding rear section compared to the ID.4 CROZZ. 2. Interior: The layout of both models is consistent. Notably, the ID.4's electronic gear selector is positioned to the right of the instrument panel. Differences can be found in details such as the center console armrest, air vents, and interior pattern designs.

As an electric vehicle owner, I've driven both the ID.4 X and ID.4 Crozz, and the differences are quite noticeable. The ID.4 X is manufactured by SAIC Volkswagen, featuring a more rounded front-end design with smooth headlight lines, giving it an urban fashion vibe. In contrast, the ID.4 Crozz is a product of FAW-Volkswagen, with a squarer front fascia that looks more imposing and rugged. In terms of driving experience, the ID.4 X leans towards comfort, offering soft and smooth handling during turns, making it ideal for city commuting. The Crozz version has slightly stiffer suspension tuning, providing stronger stability when cornering, with a sportier feel. For interior features, the ID.4 X comes with practical heated seats, while the Crozz focuses on optional panoramic sunroof for a better sense of space. Both models offer a range of over 500 kilometers, but the ID.4 X charges slightly faster, reaching 80% from 20% in just half an hour. I noticed these details during long-distance trips, which affect daily usability. It's best to test drive both before making a purchase decision.

I've been tracking EV costs for years, and the price difference between ID.4 X and ID.4 Crozz is significant. The ID.4 X typically starts several thousand yuan cheaper, offering a worry-free all-inclusive package with more accessory options and flexible warranty policies. The Crozz version is pricier but comes with a longer free maintenance period and more affordable post-warranty services like battery inspection fees. In terms of charging costs, both consume around 15 kWh per 100 km, but Crozz's fast-charging protocol has broader compatibility, making public charging stations more accessible. For insurance, ID.4 X premiums are lower, ideal for budget-conscious families, while Crozz holds higher residual value, making it easier to resell. I've crunched the numbers in my ledger—value for money depends on personal habits: frequent highway drivers should opt for Crozz, while urban commuters will find the X more economical, saving a tidy sum in pocket money.

I tried the ID.4 X's intelligent system, and the screen interface is clean with fast navigation response. The Crozz version has a different UI design, and its voice assistant performs better in Chinese recognition. Both support mobile apps, but the X version receives more frequent software updates, such as the newly added AR navigation. The Crozz version, on the other hand, offers more stable connectivity with broader signal coverage, ensuring smooth map downloads while driving. In terms of battery management, the Crozz adjusts its intelligent temperature control more actively, maintaining reliable range in winter. The X version excels in fast charging efficiency, with a full charge lasting a week. Regarding driving modes, the Crozz's automatic parking is more precise, while the X version offers more customizable settings. These technological differences are quite important as they impact daily convenience, so the choice depends on your preference for these details.

I mostly use an electric car for daily commuting. The ID.4 X offers a spacious interior, with enough room in the back for a baby seat, and excellent noise control, making it quiet on highways. The Crozz version is also large, but its trunk layout is more practical, easily fitting two suitcases for weekend picnics. In terms of seat materials, the X version is softer and more back-hugging, making long drives less tiring; the Crozz provides better support, suitable for family members of all ages. The Crozz's air conditioning cools faster, but the X version is more stable in power-saving mode. For safety features, both come with adaptive cruise control, but the X version has more responsive alert functions and timely automatic braking; the Crozz has a clearer rearview camera, making reversing more stable. When traveling with kids, I prefer the X for its comfort and peace of mind.


