What are the differences between Hexie and Fuxing?

[VanAnastasia]

The differences between Hexie and Fuxing mainly consist of three points. Different train models: The "Hexie" EMU has a "bulge" on the roof, which actually houses the pantograph and air conditioning system. The "Fuxing" has sunk this "bulge" into the air duct system under the roof, making the train not only look more aesthetically pleasing but also reducing the train's resistance by 7.5%-12.3% compared to the existing CRH380 series. When running at 350 km/h, the energy consumption per capita per 100 kilometers decreases by about 17%. Different speeds: There are many models of Hexie, and their speeds vary. Generally, they operate at speeds above 200 km/h, with a maximum speed of 350 km/h. The Fuxing can reach test speeds of 400 km/h and above, with a continuous operating speed of 350 km/h. Different WiFi: Hexie: No WiFi. Fuxing: Equipped with WiFi, fully covered throughout the train, free of charge, and each carriage can support 80-120 mobile terminals, automatically connecting without a password.

[DelNadia]

As a young person who frequently researches transportation, I always consider the Harmony CRH as the starting point of China's high-speed rail. Introduced in 2007 with foreign technology, it runs at around 350 km/h, stable but somewhat outdated, with relatively simple carriages. The Fuxing Hao is much cooler, launched in 2017, independently developed with speeds up to 400 km/h, offering significantly higher comfort, wider seats, and less noise. It also incorporates intelligent systems, such as real-time safety monitoring and energy-saving designs, reducing electricity consumption by 20%. From a technological development perspective, the Harmony CRH laid the foundation, while the Fuxing Hao represents innovation. Having ridden it multiple times, I clearly feel the progress of the times, and its connectivity to the urban network is broader, with routes like Beijing to Shanghai using the latest models.

[Garcia]

I prefer taking high-speed trains for my commute and have personally experienced the differences between the Harmony and Fuxing bullet trains. The Harmony trains have aging facilities, unstable air conditioning, and frequent delays; in contrast, the Fuxing trains are much newer, capable of speeds exceeding 400 km/h, with minimal vibration and better air purification in the cabins, making the ride more comfortable. Technologically, they have been upgraded with smarter electronic control systems, reducing the risk of malfunctions while also being more energy-efficient and cost-effective. For daily travel, the Fuxing trains shorten travel times, offer more routes like the Guangzhou-Shenzhen line, and have less ticket scarcity, making them more practical.

[LaAriana]

As someone who follows industry trends, I've observed that the Harmony series propelled the initial construction of China's high-speed rail network, reducing long-distance travel costs. The Fuxing series changed the game with a localization rate reaching 90%, cutting maintenance expenses and boosting domestic supply chain development. The economic impact is significant: while the Harmony era required intensive investment, the Fuxing's efficient operations subsequently drove employment in peripheral industries, increased export potential, and delivered better overall benefits.