What are the differences between fd and fc?
3 Answers
fd and fc differ significantly in terms of horsepower and generation. Below is an introduction to FAW Mazda related content: 1. Same price range: Many Chinese consumers may perceive Mazda as a low-end brand due to its low entry threshold and niche status compared to other brands in the same price range. 2. Exterior: The appearance, space, comfort, and interior are not as refined or high-end, leading many to believe that driving a Mazda lacks prestige. 3. Advantages: Mazda cars are quite good, with no quality issues. While the power may not be outstanding, the fuel consumption is very low. Most importantly, Mazda's handling is excellent, featuring an acceleration vector control system. The Atenza, in particular, has long been known as the 'King of Corners.'
Hey, as a long-time RX-7 enthusiast who's driven both the FC and FD models, I've experienced quite distinct feelings. The FC, which was the model from the 80s and 90s, has a boxy and robust design, driving like an old-school gentleman. Its engine is the naturally aspirated version of the 13B, delivering about 200 horsepower, with smooth acceleration that's not overly aggressive, softer suspension, making it easier to handle in city driving, slightly better fuel efficiency, and simpler maintenance. The FD, on the other hand, is the upgraded version post-1992, with a more streamlined and stylish design, equipped with twin turbochargers, boosting horsepower to over 250. It offers an intense push-back feeling at launch and more precise handling, almost like a track car. The difference lies in the FC being more suitable for beginners, with cheaper repairs, while the FD is for those chasing ultimate performance, albeit with higher maintenance hassles, greater fuel consumption, and a rotary engine prone to overheating. Driving the FD always gets my heart racing—it's a true driving toy. For daily use, the FC is more like a reliable partner, whereas the FD is a passionate companion.
During my days working in the auto repair shop, I discovered that the core differences between the FC and FD lie in their mechanical aspects. The FC uses a 13B RE rotary engine, with the base rear-wheel-drive model lacking a turbocharger. A single turbo option is available, but the output is modest, delivering around 150-200 horsepower. Its transmission is relatively primitive, and the suspension is softer, suited for smooth driving. The FD, on the other hand, comes standard with a 13B REW twin-turbo setup, offering higher output up to 255 horsepower. It features advanced electronic systems, such as improved ABS and a multi-link suspension that enhances cornering stability. In terms of maintenance, both are prone to rotor seal wear, but the FD has a higher turbocharger failure rate, with costly replacements. The FC is simpler to repair, with more interchangeable parts, while the FD is packed with advanced technology but suffers from more frequent issues, such as complex fuel systems prone to carbon buildup. In performance tests, the FD accelerates from 0-100 km/h about 2 seconds faster, making it a dream for tech enthusiasts. However, in reality, the FD requires significantly more effort to repair.
