What are the differences between CHR and IZOA?
3 Answers
CHR and IZOA mainly have the following differences: 1. CHR belongs to GAC Toyota, while IZOA belongs to FAW Toyota. 2. Exterior: The CHR adopts a mesh grille, while the IZOA uses a horizontal bar grille; the CHR features petal-shaped alloy wheels, whereas the IZOA has vortex-style alloy wheels. 3. Colors: The CHR offers 5 single colors and 6 dual colors, totaling 11 color schemes, while the IZOA only has 9. 4. Price and configuration: The CHR appears more sophisticated, providing 8 configuration options, whereas the IZOA only offers 3.
As a regular urban SUV driver, I personally test drove Toyota's IZOA and C-HR during my car selection process and found they share the same platform with nearly identical core performance. Both are equipped with either a 1.2T turbocharged engine or hybrid powertrain, paired with a smooth and fuel-efficient CVT transmission. The main differences lie in exterior styling: the IZOA features a more muscular front fascia with angular lines and a sportier grille, while the C-HR adopts a rounded, fashionable design with slightly different headlight clusters. Their interior materials and cabin layouts are virtually identical. I chose the IZOA because it comes standard with more practical features like a rearview camera (which requires an optional package on base C-HR trim), plus FAW Toyota's dealership service was more convenient for my neighborhood. After several months of driving, fuel consumption remains stable at 5-6L/100km with consistently agile handling. My advice for buyers: don't get hung up on the names—test drive both and decide based on which design appeals more and which dealer offers better promotions, as they're essentially the same car underneath.
As a car modification enthusiast who loves dismantling various models, I find the subtle differences between the IZOA and C-HR, both belonging to Toyota's C-HR series, particularly noteworthy. The powertrain is identical, utilizing Toyota's 2ZR-FXE engine with no difference in output between hybrid and gasoline versions. The suspension on the IZOA is slightly softer, tuned for Chinese road conditions and more suitable for family use, while the C-HR's setup is stiffer, offering better road feedback at the expense of comfort. Exterior distinctions are significant: the IZOA features a more aggressive honeycomb grille and unique tail lamp internals, whereas the C-HR uses horizontal chrome accents for an urban aesthetic. In terms of features, the C-HR's higher trims offer optional carbon fiber interior packages, while the base IZOA comes standard with an auto start-stop system. For modification potential, the C-HR has a richer aftermarket parts selection—I've successfully upgraded its shock absorbers. Driving feedback reveals smooth engine response with no notable changes. Purchase advice: opt for the C-HR if you prefer a sportier style, or the IZOA for better value and more standard features.
