What are the differences between BYD Tang DMp and DMi?

[OParker]

BYD Tang DMp and DMi differ in the following aspects: 1. Feature Overview: DMi focuses on front-wheel-drive fuel-efficient vehicles, while DMp targets four-wheel-drive performance vehicles. 2. Charging Status: DMp does not support fast charging, with a range of 80 kilometers and a battery capacity of 22.3 kWh. Using a 7kW slow charging station takes 4-5 hours, while household charging may require 7-8 hours. DMi offers two range options: 52km and 112km, with battery capacities of 9.98 kWh and 21.5 kWh respectively. The base 52km version lacks fast charging, but due to its smaller battery capacity, commercial charging stations can fully charge it in 2-3 hours. The 112km version supports fast charging and can typically be fully charged within 1-2 hours.

[MacFelicity]

When I was switching cars, I specifically researched the Tang DM-p and DM-i. The DM-p focuses on performance, featuring dual motors front and rear, with a 0-100 km/h acceleration of just over 4 seconds—driving it feels like a sports car, but it has higher energy consumption. The DM-i, on the other hand, is more of a fuel-saving king, with a single-motor series structure that uses electricity in the city and burns fuel on highways, achieving a fuel consumption of just over 5L when the battery is low. For daily commuting, the DM-i is fantastic if charging is convenient, cutting fuel stops by half. However, the DM-p’s electric all-wheel drive offers better stability in rain or snow, and it can even supply 6 kW of external power, allowing you to use electric stoves and ovens while camping without worrying about tripping the circuit. If you want performance, go for the DM-p; if you prioritize savings, the DM-i is the way to go. Don’t be fooled by sales pitches—remember to turn off the music during a test drive to listen to the engine sound, as the DM-p can be a bit louder during hard acceleration.

[MacJulian]

After driving the Tang DM-i for two years at home, my sister just got the DM-p, and the differences are quite noticeable. The DM-i has a lighter steering wheel, and it's as quiet as an electric car for city commuting, with the dashboard showing a cost of 15 yuan per 100 kilometers. Her DM-p pushes you back into the seat during acceleration and feels particularly stable when cornering. In terms of charging, my 55km version has enough pure electric range for school runs and grocery shopping, requiring charging three times a week; her 112km version has a longer range but consumes electricity faster, with the range dropping quickly under full throttle. When both cars are fully loaded on long trips, the DM-i feels weaker in power when the battery is depleted, requiring a deeper press on the throttle for overtaking on slopes, while the DM-p remains vigorous throughout. If the budget allows and you enjoy road trips, go for the p version; for ordinary families, the i version is more cost-effective and slightly cheaper to maintain.

[LaAlice]

The core difference lies in the three-electric system based on specifications. The DM-p is the performance plug-in hybrid variant, featuring front and rear motors paired with the Xiaoyun engine, delivering a combined power output of 452kW, with acceleration surpassing even the Cayenne. The DM-i is essentially an upgraded extended-range version, equipped with a 1.5T engine boasting 43% thermal efficiency and an EHS hybrid system, prioritizing fuel efficiency. Their battery packs also differ: the DM-p uses a 38kWh ternary lithium battery with a fast-charging time of 0.33 hours to full capacity, while the base DM-i model employs a 21kWh lithium iron phosphate battery. In terms of chassis, the DM-p comes standard with aluminum alloy suspension and perforated brake discs, offering superior vibration damping over speed bumps—justifying its nearly 80,000 RMB premium. Urban commuters should opt for the i version, while frequent highway drivers or those pursuing driving dynamics must consider the p version, whose pure-electric four-wheel-drive off-road capability significantly outperforms two-wheel-drive models by more than a tier.