What are the differences between Bentley Mulsanne and Flying Spur?

[StephanieDella]

Bentley Mulsanne and Flying Spur are both large luxury sedans. The differences between the two are as follows: 1. Different wheelbase and body dimensions: The Bentley Mulsanne has a wheelbase of 3266 mm, with length, width, and height being 5575 mm, 1926 mm, and 1521 mm respectively. The Flying Spur has a wheelbase of 3194 mm, with length, width, and height being 5316 mm, 1978 mm, and 1484 mm respectively. 2. Different engines and transmissions: The Bentley Mulsanne uses a 6.8-liter twin-turbocharged V8 engine, producing 513 horsepower and a maximum torque of 1020 Nm, with a maximum power output at 4000 rpm and maximum torque at 1750 rpm. It features direct fuel injection technology and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. This engine is paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission. The Bentley Flying Spur uses a 6.0-liter W12 twin-turbocharged engine, producing 635 horsepower and a maximum torque of 900 Nm, with a maximum power output between 5000 and 6000 rpm and maximum torque between 1350 and 4500 rpm. It features hybrid fuel injection technology and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. This engine is paired with an 8-speed dual-clutch transmission. 3. Different suspensions: The Bentley Mulsanne uses double-wishbone independent suspension at both the front and rear. The Flying Spur uses double-wishbone independent suspension at the front and multi-link independent suspension at the rear.

[AmirAnn]

I'm a huge car enthusiast and have had my eyes on Bentley for years. The Mulsanne, that top-tier luxury sedan, exudes classic, old-school charm with its massive size and rear seating so spacious it feels like a private conference room. It drives as steady as an ox, though the steering feels heavy—perfect for executives who prefer to be chauffeured in comfort. The Flying Spur, on the other hand, is younger and sportier, with a chassis tuned for dynamic handling, offering agile and spirited driving—ideal for those who enjoy taking the wheel themselves. Its rear seats are still comfortable but not as extravagant. Price-wise, the Mulsanne is significantly more expensive, with higher maintenance costs, while the Flying Spur, though not cheap, is far more practical. Overall, the Mulsanne is a status symbol, whereas the Flying Spur balances daily driving with modern flair, making it a favorite among younger buyers.

[ChristianFitz]

I've driven my friend's Mulsanne and Flying Spur, and the difference is quite noticeable. The first impression of the Mulsanne is its spaciousness and comfort—the back seat feels like a sofa, but it's a hassle to drive in the city, even parking is difficult. The Flying Spur is much more agile, with quicker power response and easier handling, making it suitable for commuting. Exterior-wise, the Mulsanne exudes a more stately and luxurious vibe, while the Flying Spur leans towards a sleek and sporty look. In terms of fuel consumption, the Mulsanne is quite thirsty and has higher maintenance costs, whereas the Flying Spur is relatively more economical. If I were to choose a daily driver, I'd lean towards the Flying Spur—it's less extravagant and has a sporty touch, making it more practical for everyday use.

[McElaina]

I recently studied car specifications, and the core differences between the Mulsanne and Flying Spur lie in their platforms and positioning. The Mulsanne is based on an independent luxury platform, with its engine emphasizing the smoothness of a V8, offering extremely spacious rear seating, purely designed for passenger comfort. The Flying Spur uses a shared sports chassis, featuring a more powerful W12 engine, agile handling, and a balance of driving pleasure. In terms of design, the Mulsanne is retro and substantial, while the Flying Spur is modern and minimalist. They target different users: the Mulsanne attracts traditional luxury buyers, whereas the Flying Spur appeals to the nouveau riche. The Mulsanne is priced significantly higher, with slightly more expensive maintenance costs.