What are the differences between Baojun 100 and 200?
3 Answers
Baojun e100 and e200 differ in dimensions, vehicle weight, and other aspects. Here are the detailed specifications: Different dimensions: The Baojun e100 measures 2488mm in length, 1506mm in width, and 1670mm in height; the e200 measures 2497mm in length, 1526mm in width, and 1616mm in height. Different minimum ground clearance: The Baojun e100 has a minimum ground clearance of 130mm; the e200 has a minimum ground clearance of 125mm. Different vehicle weight: The Baojun e100 weighs 849 kilograms; the e200 weighs 860 kilograms.
I used to drive a Baojun 310, and now I drive a Baojun 510. There's quite a difference in daily use. The Baojun 310 is a compact sedan—smaller in size, easy to park, but cramped inside, and the trunk can't handle large items. The 510 is an SUV with a taller body and better visibility, and the back seat can comfortably fit three adults. In terms of power, the 310 has a 1.2L engine—quick off the line but feels unstable at high speeds. The 510 uses a 1.5L engine, making hill climbs and acceleration easier, and it feels more stable on highways. The fuel tank capacities are similar, but the 510 consumes more fuel, making it less economical for long trips. The interior has also changed—the 510 features a touchscreen for easier navigation and music control. Price-wise, the 310 is 20,000–30,000 RMB cheaper, making it a good choice for those on a tight budget. Overall, if you frequently carry passengers or drive on highways, the 510 is the better pick. For pure city commuting, the 310 is sufficient.
As a car enthusiast, I feel the Baojun 310 and 510 offer completely different driving experiences. The 310 is compact and agile, turning as quickly as a sports car. Its 1.2-liter engine runs quietly but lacks punch, making highway overtaking a bit challenging. The 510, with its SUV chassis, rides higher and smoother over rough roads. Its 1.5-liter engine delivers stronger output, providing immediate acceleration and a noticeable push-back sensation when you step on the gas, thanks to its more stable chassis tuning. The 510 also features electric power steering, making the steering wheel as light as in a video game. In terms of fuel consumption, the 310 is more economical, averaging 6-7 liters per 100 kilometers in city driving, while the 510 is slightly higher at 8-9 liters but more reassuring on long trips. Space is the 510's strong suit, with ample rear legroom and a trunk spacious enough for items like a stroller. Design is another highlight, with the 510 boasting sleeker lines that appeal to young families.
