What are the 5 differences between Mazda CX-30 and CX-5?
3 Answers
Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 differ in three aspects: body size, configuration, and power output. Here are the specific details: Body Size: The latest top-trim Mazda CX-30 measures 4395(mm) in length, 1797(mm) in width, and 1545(mm) in height, with a wheelbase of 2653(mm). The latest top-trim Mazda CX-5 measures 4555(mm) in length, 1842(mm) in width, and 1685(mm) in height, with a wheelbase of 2700(mm). Overall Configuration: The top-trim Mazda CX-5 has more features than the top-trim Mazda CX-30. Power Output: The Mazda CX-30 is equipped with a 2.0L naturally aspirated engine paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission, while the Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a 2.5L naturally aspirated engine paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission.
As someone who moves frequently, I've compared the space differences between the Mazda CX-30 and CX-5. The CX-30 is a compact SUV, with a body length of approximately 4.4 meters, and its interior space is relatively cramped, especially the rear seats which can feel tight for taller adults. The trunk capacity is about 430 liters, which gets full with just one suitcase. The CX-5 is a midsize SUV, longer at about 4.6 meters, with more spacious rear seats that comfortably accommodate three people, and a trunk of around 875 liters that can easily fit a stroller or tent. During my test drive, the CX-30 felt agile in the city and was easy to park, but it's not ideal for long trips. The CX-5 is better suited for family outings, especially with children or pets, thanks to its comfortable seats and excellent visibility. The storage designs differ between the two, with the CX-5 featuring larger door pockets, making it more practical overall.
I'm a car enthusiast and love Mazda's design language. The CX-30 has more streamlined and sporty lines, like the fastback shape and sharp headlights, giving it a youthful and trendy vibe. The CX-5 has a more stable and rounded exterior, with less edginess. Inside, the CX-30 uses more soft materials and touchscreens, with a newer interface that supports smartphone connectivity, while the CX-5 has a smaller screen and a more classic style. I think the CX-30's modern feel is more eye-catching, especially with its cool ambient lighting at night, but the CX-5's materials are more durable and hard-wearing. The tech features are quite similar, both equipped with automatic emergency braking, but the CX-30's new heads-up display makes driving more intuitive. Overall, the CX-30 suits those chasing trends, while the CX-5 leans more traditional.
