The Differences Between Geely Emgrand GS and Emgrand S
3 Answers
Geely Emgrand GS and Emgrand S differ in the following aspects: Price: The top variant of Emgrand S is officially priced lower than that of Emgrand GS. Overall Body: The top variant of Emgrand S has a shorter body length compared to Emgrand GS, but both share the same wheelbase. Power Output: The top variant of Emgrand GS delivers stronger performance than Emgrand S. Product Positioning: Although Emgrand S shares many similarities with Emgrand GS in terms of vehicle type, Emgrand S focuses more on brand upgrades in youthful sportiness, fashion sense, and technological appeal.
The differences between the Emgrand GS and Emgrand S are quite noticeable in terms of appearance. The GS features a typical crossover design with a slightly higher chassis for a sporty feel, a somewhat sloping roofline at the rear, giving it a more aggressive and youthful vibe. The S, on the other hand, is more trendy with a sharper front grille, cooler taillight design, and overall smoother lines. I’ve driven my friend’s GS before and felt the interior was a bit plain, with a somewhat hard plastic feel when sitting inside. The S, however, upgrades with large soft-touch materials, offering a plush feel and dual-tone options, significantly improving comfort. In terms of colors, the S offers more fashionable options like sapphire blue, making it more eye-catching on the road. When parked, people around often say the S stands out more. For daily use, the GS suits those who prefer a rugged style, while the S is more for fashion-forward drivers. Both are fuel-efficient, but the S pays more attention to details, making driving more enjoyable.
When it comes to power and technology, the Emgrand GS uses the older 1.4T or 1.8L engines, with average acceleration response—adequate for city driving but somewhat flat on highways. The Emgrand S upgrades to a 1.4T turbocharged version, offering slightly more maximum horsepower. Paired with a CVT transmission, it delivers quicker starts and stronger climbing power. From my test-drive comparison, the S's transmission tuning is smoother, with less shift shock and reduced engine noise. In terms of the chassis, the S features an optimized rear suspension, resulting in lighter vibrations over speed bumps and better handling stability. For fuel consumption, the GS averages around 8L in the city, while the S is slightly more economical at 7.5L, saving money in the long run. The S also leads in safety features, adding blind-spot monitoring and lane-keeping assist, making its driver-assist functions more considerate in traffic jams. Overall, the GS is reliable but somewhat outdated, while the S elevates the driving experience a notch higher.
