
It is recommended to purchase the mid-range version of BYD Han. Below are the differences between the base and mid-range versions of BYD Han: 1. Power: The base version of BYD Han delivers strong performance. The mid-range version is front-wheel drive with a combined maximum power of 163 kW and a combined maximum torque of 330 N•m, while the base version boasts a system combined maximum power of 363 kW and a maximum torque of 680 N•m, offering significantly stronger power. The 0-100 km/h acceleration time for the mid-range version is 3.9 seconds, whereas the mid-range version achieves 7.9 kW. 2. Front Brakes: The base version uses ventilated and perforated disc brakes, while the mid-range version features ventilated disc brakes. 3. Range: The mid-range version offers a range of 605 km, compared to the base version's 550 km.

I previously helped a friend choose the Han, and the base model's configuration is actually quite impressive. The battery and motor are the same, with no reduction in range. Basic features like LED headlights and automatic air conditioning are all included. The mid-range model is about 10,000 yuan more expensive, mainly adding L2 driving assistance and seat heating/ventilation, which you might not use much if you mainly drive in the city. Personally, I think the most worthwhile option is the luxury package—for just 7,000 yuan, you can add Dynaudio audio and an electric tailgate, which is more cost-effective than upgrading to the mid-range model. However, it's worth noting that the base model has smaller wheels, so tire noise might be slightly more noticeable. If you prioritize quietness, I recommend test-driving both versions for comparison.

I've been driving the mid-trim Han for almost a year now, and the extra money was definitely worth it. With a two-hour daily commute, the L2 assisted driving takes over on highways, making it super worry-free and reducing commute fatigue by more than half. The seat ventilation is a lifesaver in the south—no more sweaty backs. The most surprising feature was the lane change assist, which provides full security when changing lanes in the rain. There's a noticeable difference between the low-trim steel suspension and the mid-trim aluminum alloy when going over speed bumps, especially for rear passengers. The only downside is that the extra money spent could cover four years of charging—it depends on whether you prioritize the initial investment or long-term comfort.

To put it bluntly, it mainly depends on how much highway driving you do annually. For someone like me who averages 3,000 kilometers of long-distance driving per month, the mid-range model is definitely the choice—adaptive cruise control keeps my legs and back from getting sore on highways, and lane centering makes driving much easier. If 90% of your driving is city commuting, the base model is completely sufficient. The panoramic camera in the mid-range model isn’t very useful for an experienced driver like me, but the automatic parking feature is very helpful for beginners. My personal advice is to consider your budget—the money saved could cover the cost of installing three home charging stations.


