
There is no one around during the Subject 2 driving test. Currently, the entire test has been switched to electronic evaluation, with no instructors or safety officers accompanying the examinee in the vehicle. During the test, only the examinee is in the car, and there are no other personnel in the test area besides the examinee. Subject 2, also known as the small road test, is part of the motor vehicle driver's license assessment. It is the abbreviation for the field driving skills test, which evaluates the examinee's mastery of motor vehicle driving skills and their ability to judge spatial positioning. The test requires the examinee to drive the vehicle themselves in a designated area. The test items for Subject 2 include: reversing into a parking space (left and right), parallel parking, curve driving, right-angle turns, and stopping and starting on a slope.

I remember during the driving test for Subject 2, there was always an examiner sitting in the passenger seat, watching my every move—steering, reversing into the parking space, and so on. On the test day, I was extremely nervous, my palms were sweating, but the examiner's reminders actually helped me focus more. He held a scoring sheet and judged every action strictly. After the test, I asked a few friends who had passed, and they confirmed that these were the exam rules to ensure safety and fairness. In fact, the presence of the invigilator serves both as supervision and support, preventing students from reckless driving and accidents. The test center's regulations are arranged this way to ensure more standardized driving in the future. Although the pressure was high, having someone there did make it feel safer.

There must be proctors arranged on-site to supervise the entire process during the Subject 2 driving test. This is a fundamental requirement of the examination system to prevent any cheating behaviors and ensure the safety of both vehicles and personnel. The proctors either sit in the car or stand nearby to observe the execution of test items, control the timing, and score the performance. Without their presence, the test would be invalid. When I took the test myself, I experienced the details firsthand—the examiner would even guide minor mistakes, helping candidates adapt. As a result, the pass rate becomes fairer, and beginners are less likely to make major errors. Looking back, this design is truly considerate.

During the driving test (Subject 2), my heart was pounding wildly just because the examiner sat in the passenger seat closely monitoring every move. That feeling of being supervised was truly nerve-wracking, but after the test, the examiner explained it was all for safety considerations. When I made mistakes, he gently reminded me not to give up, which actually helped ease the tension. The presence of the proctor made the test feel more authentic and reliable, giving beginners like me the confidence to safely perform maneuvers like reversing. The whole experience, though stressful, was ultimately worthwhile.


