Is the Ford Kuga Fuel Consumption High?

[LaGrace]

Ford Kuga's fuel consumption is not high, with an actual fuel consumption of 7.5 to 8.8 liters per 100 kilometers. As an SUV, its fuel consumption is relatively low. Taking the 2019 Ford Kuga as an example, it belongs to the compact SUV category, with body dimensions of: length 4525mm, width 1838mm, height 1685mm, wheelbase 2690mm, fuel tank capacity of 60 liters, and curb weight of 1592kg. The 2019 Ford Kuga is equipped with a 1.5T turbocharged engine, with a maximum horsepower of 182PS, maximum power of 134kW, maximum torque of 245Nm, and is paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission.

[Kimberly]

I think the Ford Kuga's reputation as a gas guzzler is well-deserved. My daily commute is in a 2015 2.0T four-wheel-drive version, and in the city with the air conditioning on, it's common to consume 12 to 14 liters per 100 kilometers. When traffic is really bad, it can spike to 16 liters. On the highway, it drops to around 9 liters. The weight of an American SUV plus the four-wheel-drive system really does guzzle fuel. My friends who drive Japanese SUVs generally get 2-3 liters better mileage than me, and it hurts every time I fill up. That said, the car has a stable chassis and plenty of power, making it quite comfortable for long trips—you can't have your cake and eat it too. If you're particularly concerned about fuel costs, I'd recommend avoiding rush hour and filling up during discount periods to save a bit.

[DelChristian]

Having driven the Ford Kuga 1.5T FWD for three years, here's my real experience: in winter with heating on, city driving consumes around 9.5L, while in summer with AC on, it goes up to 11L in the city. The most fuel-efficient scenario is maintaining a steady 70-80 km/h on national highways, achieving around 7.8L. My friend's older 2.0T model is even thirstier, starting at 14L in the city. Traffic jams are the worst – you can literally watch the fuel gauge drop. Some fuel-saving tips that worked for me: anticipate road conditions to avoid sudden braking, turn off the engine at red lights exceeding 30 seconds, and regularly declutter the trunk. Keeping tire pressure at 2.6 saves about half a liter compared to 2.3. After switching to Michelin energy-saving tires, my overall fuel consumption dropped by approximately 0.8L.

[LePatrick]

With ten years of experience in auto repair, I've worked on many Ford Escapes. The fuel consumption varies: for the 2013 2.0T model, 13L/100km in the city is normal, while older cars with severe carbon buildup can reach 16L/100km. The newer 1.5T models with auto start-stop perform much better, showing 9.1L/100km on the display but actually consuming around 10.5L/100km. I've noticed a pattern: poorly maintained cars are particularly fuel-thirsty, especially those with long-overdue air filter and spark plug replacements – their fuel consumption can increase by 20%. Some owners report sudden fuel consumption spikes after refueling, which is usually due to a faulty purge valve; replacing it solves the issue. For better fuel efficiency, focus on checking three key areas: oxygen sensor readings, throttle opening angle, and uneven tire wear.

[VonKeegan]

Just traded in my 2017 Ford Escape. The most frustrating issue was the wildly fluctuating fuel consumption: driving gently would yield just over 10L/100km, but aggressive overtaking could spike it to 14L. Real-world testing showed a 0.7L/100km difference between 92 and 95 octane fuel, but factoring in price per liter made the premium fuel even less economical. Wintertime short trips for school runs saw terrifying consumption reaching 16L/100km. The transmission programming was the real fuel guzzler - its jerky 40km/h gear shifts felt like being kicked, with the fuel gauge visibly trembling each time. One mountain road trip recorded a record-breaking 19.8L/100km. While highway driving might be tolerable, pure city commuting with this SUV requires serious consideration. Switching to a hybrid now saves me 800 yuan monthly in fuel costs.