Is the Changan CS75 a gas guzzler?

[SanJosiah]

Changan CS75 current models are not gas guzzlers. Below are relevant details about the Changan CS75: 1. Exterior: 2700mm wheelbase, bold front grille design, smooth body side lines, quality metal chrome decorations; 2. Interior: Multi-layer three-dimensional dual-barrel instrument panel paired with a 3.5-inch TFT color display, integrated central control area with personalized air vent decorative panels; 3. Powertrain: BlueCore 2.0VVT powerful engine with maximum power of 116KW/6000rpm and maximum torque of 200N·m/4000-4500rpm, 1.8T turbocharged engine with maximum power of 130KW/5500rpm and maximum torque of 230N·m/5000rpm, delivering stable and smooth power output, equipped with 6MT efficient transmission featuring high transmission efficiency and smooth gear shifting.

[SanMaddox]

As a CS75 owner who has driven it for three years and covered over 50,000 kilometers, this car's fuel consumption is quite sensitive to road conditions. The 1.5T automatic transmission can reach 10-11 liters per 100km in city traffic jams, and it gets even worse with AC on. However, it performs much better on highways, averaging just over 7 liters. My neighbor's Haval H6 consumes even more fuel, while my colleague's Boyue is about the same as this car. I'd recommend choosing the new Blue Whale engine version - it maintains the same power while reducing fuel consumption by over 1 liter. With its 60L fuel tank filled up, it can run about 600 kilometers. Actually, all SUVs are fuel-intensive. If you want better fuel efficiency, just buy a sedan instead - though the high seating position and excellent visibility of SUVs are truly incomparable.

[VonMackenzie]

Just accompanied a friend to test drive the new CS75PLUS at the 4S dealership. The salesperson claimed the 1.5T model has a combined fuel consumption of 8.2L. I checked real-world data from Dongchedi, where most owner reviews of the previous model reported around 9L - the new Blue Core engine does show improvement. Considering its curb weight of nearly 1.6 tons (200kg heavier than Japanese SUVs), slightly higher fuel consumption is understandable. For those particularly concerned about fuel costs, the third-generation Blue Core engine paired with 48V mild hybrid is worth considering - it offers smoother start-stop operation and better fuel efficiency, though it costs about 10,000 yuan more.

[Kathleen]

I chose the CS75 for its spaciousness, and now after 8,000 km, it shows 9.3L/100km on the dashboard. Gotta say driving style makes a big difference – once I drove gently on the elevated road and got a surprising 6.8L. This car consumes more fuel during cold starts, so avoid heavy throttle before the engine warms up. Regular maintenance is crucial; last time after switching to full synthetic oil, fuel consumption dropped by 0.5L. I used to keep two cases of mineral water in the trunk year-round, and after removing them, fuel efficiency improved – weight reduction actually works. My advice: rent one for two days to test real-world fuel consumption before buying, way more reliable than sales pitches.

[Sam]

Compared the fuel consumption reports of the CS75 and Tiggo 8. Both with 1.5T engines, the CS75 has a median fuel consumption of 9.2L, while the Tiggo 8 is at 8.9L. The key difference lies in the transmission matching—the CS75 uses an Aisin 6AT, which is more fuel-consuming but more durable compared to the dual-clutch. Some car owners in the group switch to 92-octane fuel to save money, but I recommend using 95-octane for quieter engine noise and smoother power delivery. Don’t forget to clean carbon deposits during maintenance, especially if you frequently drive short distances, as spark plug condition directly affects combustion efficiency. Let’s do the math: driving 20,000 km annually, this car costs about 1,500 yuan more in fuel compared to fuel-efficient Japanese models, but the added features like a panoramic sunroof and electric seats easily make up for the difference.

[LillianaDella]

Recent research on the fuel consumption of domestic SUVs revealed a pattern: Changan's engines boast impressive specs but fall short in fuel efficiency compared to Chery. The CS75 automatic transmission model typically starts at 10L for urban commuting, but can be kept around 8L with frequent suburban driving. The new Blue Whale engine's 40% thermal efficiency is quite competitive, though the transmission tuning holds it back somewhat. Recommendations for potential buyers: opt for vehicles manufactured after the 2023 model year, as the manufacturer has optimized the ECU programming; maintaining tire pressure at 2.5 is more fuel-efficient than 2.3; avoid installing roof cargo boxes, as increased wind resistance can easily add 1L to fuel consumption. At the same price point, the Jetta VS5 is worth considering, though its plasticky interior may require some tolerance.