Is the Baojun 510 or the Vision X3 more fuel-consuming?

[OGrant]

Vision X3 is more fuel-consuming: 1. According to the MIIT fuel consumption data, the Baojun 510 manual transmission has a fuel consumption of 5.6L per 100km, while the Vision X3 has 6.3L. 2. In actual driving conditions, based on user test data, the Baojun 510 manual transmission has an average fuel consumption of around 6.5L per 100km, while the Vision X3 averages around 8L, making the Baojun 510 more fuel-efficient. 3. In terms of power, both the Baojun 510 and Vision X3 are equipped with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine. The Baojun 510 uses the mature L2B engine, with a maximum output power of 82KW and peak torque of 147nm, achieving an actual fuel consumption of approximately 6.3-6.9L per 100km. The Vision X3 is powered by the Geely King Kong engine, with a maximum power of 75kW and peak torque of 141nm, and its actual fuel consumption may exceed 7.0L per 100km. Compared to the Baojun 510, the Vision X3 has weaker power and higher fuel consumption.

[MalachiLynn]

As someone who frequently studies car data, I believe there isn't much difference in fuel consumption between the Baojun 510 and the Vision X3, but overall the Baojun 510 is more fuel-efficient. According to the MIIT fuel consumption data, the manual transmission Baojun 510 averages around 6.3L/100km, while the manual transmission Vision X3 is about 7L/100km, a difference of nearly 1L. This gap is mainly due to the engine and vehicle weight. The Baojun 510 uses a smaller displacement engine with higher efficiency and is slightly lighter, making it less fuel-intensive to drive. Of course, actual fuel consumption also depends on how you drive. In city traffic jams, the Vision X3 might spike to over 8L, while the Baojun 510 generally stays around 7L. My suggestion is, if you commute daily, saving fuel means saving money. In the long run, the Baojun 510 is more cost-effective. Both cars are quite sturdy and durable, so you don't have to worry about frequent trips to the repair shop.

[CourtneyLynn]

My neighbor Lao Wang drives a Baojun 510. When I asked him about the fuel consumption, he said it's quite economical, averaging 7L/100km in the city and even lower at 6.5L on the highway. Another friend, Xiao Li, owns a Geely Vision X3, which consumes close to 8L in the city and around 7L on the highway. Based on this experience, the Baojun 510 performs slightly better, but the Geely Vision X3 offers smoother performance with quieter engine noise, making it less noisy to drive. I think choosing a car shouldn't just be about fuel consumption; comfort and maintenance costs should also be considered. The Vision X3 has cheaper parts, so the overall maintenance pressure isn't too high. If you often drive long distances, both models are fine, but for city commuting, I'd recommend the Baojun 510—after all, saving more fuel means saving more pocket money.

[JacksonRose]

From a fuel-saving perspective, the Baojun 510 outperforms the Vision X3 by a noticeable margin. Official figures show the Baojun 510 manual at 6.2L/100km, while the Vision X3 manual is 7L/100km. In city driving, the Vision X3 typically consumes 1-2L more fuel. Having test-driven both models, the Baojun 510 starts quickly with a lighter throttle, whereas the Vision X3 feels steadier but heavier, resulting in slightly higher fuel consumption. Driving habits also play a significant role—if you accelerate aggressively or frequently use air conditioning, the Vision X3 will show more pronounced fuel consumption. In terms of routine maintenance, both vehicles are straightforward for basic upkeep, but the Vision X3's engine noise is louder, which might indirectly increase driving stress.