Is Manual Evaluation Used for Subject 2 of the Driving Test?

[MacAlice]

Subject 2 of the driving test does not require manual evaluation; the entire process is automatically assessed by a computer. Introduction to Subject 2: Subject 2, also known as the small road test, is part of the motor vehicle driver's license assessment. It is the abbreviation for the field driving skills test. For the C1 license, the test items include five mandatory components: reversing into a garage, parallel parking, stopping and starting on a slope, turning at a right angle, and curve driving (commonly known as the S-curve). In some regions, there is a sixth item: high-speed card collection. For the C2 license, the test includes four mandatory components: reversing into a garage, parallel parking, turning at a right angle, and curve driving (commonly known as the S-curve). Precautions for Subject 2:

[ValerieMarie]

Nowadays, most driving test centers for Subject 2 use a combination of electronic monitoring and manual evaluation. Electronic devices mainly monitor rigid indicators like vehicle position, such as whether the car crosses the line during reverse parking. However, details like stalling several times at startup or the smoothness of parking still rely on the examiner sitting beside you to judge. They observe whether you're shaking from nervousness or if your operations are steady enough. So attitude during the test is crucial—being polite to the examiner never hurts. If you encounter a false alarm from the electronic device, like it signaling you crossed the line when you actually didn't, you can apply for a manual review on the spot.

[OLeila]

I recently passed the Subject 2 driving test, with an examiner sitting in the passenger seat monitoring the entire process. Although electronic devices can measure distance, actions like how many turns the steering wheel made and gear-shifting timing still require manual recording. Especially during the hill start, the examiner paid close attention to whether the vehicle rolled back more than 30 centimeters. Before signing off after the test, the examiner pointed out my deduction points, mentioning that the front wheel angle exceeded the line during parallel parking—something the electronic equipment couldn't clearly capture. So, human judgment is actually more flexible, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of real driving situations.

[DiMiles]

Every examination vehicle in the test center is equipped with a safety officer examiner. The electronic system only monitors clear rules such as crossing lines or stalling, but details like whether the rearview mirror observation is sufficient or if the turn signal is held for at least three seconds rely entirely on the examiner's sharp eyes. My cousin was reminded after his test that his mirror-checking frequency was insufficient. This humanized evaluation actually helps candidates identify bad habits. If it were purely electronic judgment, many safety details could easily be overlooked.