Is it better to use 92 or 95 octane fuel for the Teana?
3 Answers
Currently available Teana models come with either a 2.0L or 2.0T engine. The 2.0L naturally aspirated engine uses 92 octane fuel, while the 2.0T turbocharged engine requires 95 octane fuel. Here is more information about the Nissan Teana: 1. The Teana is a flagship mid-to-high-end luxury sedan under the NISSAN brand. On October 30, 2020, the Dongfeng Nissan 2021 Teana was officially launched, offering a total of 6 models. The new Teana has been upgraded in terms of exterior, interior, intelligent configurations, and technological features, including VC-TURBO super variable compression engine, ProPILOT autonomous driving, and Nissan Connect intelligent connectivity. 2. The 2021 Teana is equipped with either a 2.0L naturally aspirated or a 2.0T turbocharged engine, paired with a new intelligent XTRONIC-CVT continuously variable transmission that offers a gear range equivalent to an 8AT.
I've been driving my Teana for almost three years, always using 92-octane gasoline, and it feels great. The manual recommends 92-octane or higher, and this fuel's octane rating is sufficient. It runs smoothly for daily commutes without any knocking issues. The fuel consumption is also economical, saving me dozens of yuan per tank, which adds up to significant savings over time. Although 95-octane gasoline has a higher octane rating and some friends say it starts smoother, I’ve tried it a few times and didn’t notice much difference—it’s not worth the extra cost. On the highway, it performs just as steadily with 92-octane, which is more than enough. The Teana is designed to be durable and reliable. Overall, 92-octane offers great value for money, aligns with the manufacturer’s recommendation, and gives me peace of mind.
As a long-time owner of the Teana, I've driven it for over five years and tried both 92 and 95 octane fuels. The 92 octane is economical and cost-effective, with its octane rating meeting the engine's requirements. The throttle response feels agile, and there's no noticeable jerking in city traffic jams. The 95 octane is slightly more expensive, offering marginally better smoothness during acceleration, especially in high summer temperatures with lower knock risk, but the improvement is minimal. The manual clearly states that 92 octane or above is sufficient, and 92 octane fully meets the requirements—long-term use hasn't caused any engine issues. In terms of fuel costs, 92 octane saves a few percentage points per 100 kilometers, adding up to better value over time. I recommend prioritizing 92 octane and switching to 95 octane only for special driving conditions like long trips or mountainous areas for a better balance.
