
AWD is useful when climbing slopes, for the following specific reasons: 1. AWD can provide strong power to the car, ensuring its dynamic performance and handling performance, and preventing the car from slipping on uphill sections. 2. When using AWD in a car, during the driving process, the AWD system relies on front-wheel drive, and it only intervenes when the car is driving on sections with poor road conditions. 3. Compared to a full-time four-wheel drive system, the structure of AWD is much simpler. Due to the special structure of the AWD system, it is more suitable for models equipped with a front transverse engine front-drive platform.

The part-time four-wheel drive is indeed useful for climbing steep slopes, but it depends on the situation. My city SUV usually runs in two-wheel drive and automatically switches to four-wheel drive when encountering icy slopes, allowing it to climb steadily without wheel slip. However, when it comes to tackling steep off-road slopes, it falls far short of the capabilities of a hardcore off-roader's four-wheel drive—part-time four-wheel drive relies on the computer detecting slip before distributing power, which always lags a bit, and sometimes the vehicle rolls back before the power is locked. I’ve tried it myself a few times: dry dirt slopes are no problem, but for slopes with gravel or mud, I have to turn off the ESP and give it a go, otherwise, the power cuts off just as it kicks in. For owners who frequently climb steep slopes, I’d recommend opting for a hardcore four-wheel drive with a differential lock for more direct power distribution.

From a mechanical principle perspective, the torque distribution logic of an on-demand four-wheel-drive system is suitable for mild off-road steep slopes. For example, when navigating muddy slopes at construction sites on rainy days, a 50:50 power distribution between the front and rear wheels can prevent slipping and spinning. However, the electronic limited-slip capability is its weak point: the system simulates locking by braking, which may lead to overheating during prolonged climbs. Last week, when driving a friend’s transverse-engine SUV up a 35-degree slope, the front wheels slipped for half a second before the system intervened, and just as the rear wheels started to deliver power, the engine overheated and entered protection mode. For those serious about high-intensity off-roading, opting for full-time four-wheel drive or part-time four-wheel drive is more reliable, as these systems also offer better transmission cooling.

Having driven 6 vehicles with on-demand AWD, the hill-climbing experience heavily depends on manufacturer tuning. Some Japanese models only engage AWD below 60km/h, making it ineffective on steep slopes. German vehicles pre-load torque during hill starts - the AWD indicator light signals power distribution. Test data shows on-demand AWD typically handles 25-35 degree inclines, sufficient for mountain switchbacks or parking garage ramps. Note: Worn treads or overinflated tires reduce traction, rendering even powerful AWD useless.

There's a consensus in the modification community: When climbing with part-time 4WD, it's best to switch to AT tires. Factory tires are too slippery on gravelly steep slopes, and the 4WD system can't respond quickly enough, leading to getting stuck. I often see urban SUVs being towed out at off-road parks—not because the 4WD is inadequate, but because the power distribution can't keep up with the wheel speed difference. In actual tests, when the vehicle's center of gravity shifts backward, front wheel traction decreases, and some part-time 4WD systems even reduce rear axle output, causing the vehicle to slide downhill. For long-distance climbs, it's recommended to switch to manual mode and use 1st gear for more sustained engine torque.


