Is a Vehicle License Required for Compensation When the Other Party is Fully at Fault?
2 Answers
When the other party is fully at fault in an accident, a vehicle license is required for compensation. Below are specific details about full liability: Full Liability of Motor Vehicles: Full liability of motor vehicles includes accidents caused by running a red light, not following traffic rules, illegal lane occupation or parking, drunk or intoxicated driving, failing to use turn signals when turning right at intersections, or making sudden U-turns on the road. It also includes accidents where the motor vehicle fails to use turn signals to warn vehicles behind or ahead while driving normally on the road. All these scenarios constitute full liability of the motor vehicle. Full Liability of Non-Motor Vehicles: Full liability of non-motor vehicles is similar to that of motor vehicles, including accidents caused by running a red light, not following traffic rules, or deliberately running a red light and colliding with other non-motor vehicles or pedestrians who are proceeding normally with a green light. In such cases, the non-motor vehicle bears full liability.
Last time my car got hit, the other party was fully at fault. When filing the insurance claim, they indeed asked for my vehicle registration certificate. The insurance company said it's standard procedure to verify vehicle information and ownership, preventing fraudulent claims. Think about it - without the registration certificate, the claim process could drag on for days. I've even heard of owners who forgot theirs and had to make multiple trips to the police station to get supplementary proof, wasting both time and money. That's why I always carry all necessary documents: vehicle registration, driver's license, ID card, and insurance policy - it speeds up the process significantly. Also, remember to take photos of the damage for the insurance company to assess compensation. Bottom line: when driving, having all documents ready saves you headaches later.
