How to distinguish between Prado 2700 and 4000?
3 Answers
The main differences between these two models lie in their power and configurations. The specific distinctions are as follows: Fuel tank capacity: The 2700 has a fuel tank capacity of 87L, while the 4000 has a capacity of 150L. Power: The 2700 is equipped with a Toyota 2.7L V6 (2GR engine) with a maximum power of 110KW; the 4000 has a 4.0L V6 (1GR engine) with a maximum power of 179KW. The 2700 is powered by a 2.7L 2TR-FE engine, whereas the 4000 uses a 4.0L 1GR-FE engine. Displacement: The 2700 has a displacement of 2694CC, and the 4000 has a displacement of 3956CC. The 4000 has a larger displacement than the 2700.
The Prado 2700 and 4000 are quite easy to distinguish by checking a few external details. I often see them at my friend's dealership. The 2700 usually has 'PRADO' or '2.7L' lettering on the rear, with simpler wheel designs and a single exhaust pipe. The 4000 often features 'V6' or '4.0L' badges, larger and more sporty wheels, and possibly dual exhaust pipes. The biggest difference lies in the engines: the 2700 has a 2.7L inline 4-cylinder engine, which is smaller, more fuel-efficient, and quieter for city driving; the 4000 comes with a 4.0L V6 engine, larger and more powerful, excelling in off-road or high-speed acceleration. The model year can have some impact—older versions show clearer distinctions, while newer models look more similar, but the 4000's throttle response is noticeably quicker during a test drive. Always check the VIN or the power indicator on the dashboard for a clear confirmation.
The driving experience between the Land Cruiser Prado 2700 and 4000 differs significantly, as I've tested multiple times on mountain roads. The 4000 model has a 4.0L engine with strong acceleration and noticeable back-push force, especially when climbing steep slopes—it easily surges forward with a press of the throttle. It offers quick starts and smooth overtaking but has higher fuel consumption, averaging over 15L, making it somewhat wasteful for city driving. The 2700, with its smaller 2.7L engine, delivers weaker power. It starts slower but more steadily in urban areas, with fuel consumption at just 10-12L, making it economical and suitable for daily commutes. In terms of handling, both have similar suspension systems and comparable cornering agility, but the 4000 is better suited for off-road enthusiasts or those needing greater power. Noise control is slightly better in the 2700, while the 4000’s engine is louder at high RPMs. Overall, choose the 4000 for driving excitement and the 2700 for practicality.
