How to choose between Nissan Qashqai and Skoda Karoq

[LeKylie]

The exterior design of the Skoda Karoq adopts a crystal-cut design language, which is hard to define as beautiful or not, but it has much higher recognition than the Nissan Qashqai. The interior design of the Karoq is relatively conventional; while the Qashqai's interior breaks the mold, perfectly catering to the tastes of young people.

[OGenevieve]

As a family user, I prioritize comfort and practicality for family trips when choosing a car. The Qashqai offers ample space, with well-cushioned seats that live up to Nissan's reputation for sofa-like comfort—no back pain even on long drives. The Karoq has a wheelbase of 2688mm, longer than the Qashqai's 2646mm, providing more legroom for rear passengers and a larger trunk capacity, easily accommodating a stroller plus luggage. The Qashqai's ground clearance of 182mm ensures no worries about scraping the undercarriage on rough roads, while the Karoq's stiffer suspension makes bumps over speed strips more noticeable. In terms of fuel efficiency, the Qashqai's 2.0L+CVT averages 8L/100km in the city, compared to the Karoq's 1.4T+DSG at around 9L. The Qashqai also has lower maintenance costs. It comes with an automatic emergency braking system, whereas the Karoq only includes ACC in mid-to-high trims. I recommend focusing on the Qashqai's top-tier model.

[LeMakayla]

As a young person who values handling, I have a say in this. The KAROQ's 1.4T turbocharged engine delivers 150 horsepower, giving it a quicker start than the Qashqai's 2.0L naturally aspirated 151 horsepower engine. The dual-clutch transmission shifts down decisively, providing a strong push-back feeling when overtaking. The Qashqai has lighter steering, making it easier to drive in the city. On the highway, the KAROQ's German-engineered chassis feels more stable, with less body roll in corners and clearer road feedback through the steering wheel, while the Qashqai's comfort-oriented suspension requires slowing down for sharp turns. The Qashqai has slightly better noise insulation and lower tire noise; the KAROQ's sport seats offer strong support but are firmer. If you enjoy spirited driving, go for the KAROQ, and if your budget allows, I recommend the top trim with the sport mode—it’s especially thrilling when you occasionally floor the accelerator.

[SanAlexandra]

Budgeting on a tight string: The entry-level Nissan Qashqai starts at just over 150,000 yuan, while the Skoda Karoq begins at 140,000 yuan after discounts. The Qashqai requires maintenance every 5,000 km with minor services costing around 400 yuan; the Karoq's turbocharged engine is slightly more expensive to maintain, with minor services at approximately 600 yuan. In terms of fuel consumption, the Qashqai averages 7-8L in the city, while the Karoq averages 8-9L. For insurance, the Qashqai costs about 5,000 yuan in the first year, whereas the Karoq is 200-300 yuan cheaper. Nissan holds its value slightly better, with a 5% higher residual value after three years compared to Skoda. Repair costs for the Qashqai are lower due to more aftermarket parts availability, while some Karoq parts are shared with Volkswagen. For a budget under 150,000 yuan, the mid-range Karoq is recommended, as the savings can cover two years' worth of fuel expenses.