How to Choose Between Mazda CX-4 and KAROQ?

[EverlyMarie]

Here are the specific differences between the Mazda CX-4 and KAROQ: 1. Interior: Both the KAROQ and Mazda CX-4 feature a minimalist interior design with well-organized functional areas, making them easy to operate. However, in terms of configuration, the KAROQ leads significantly. It comes standard with features like one-touch up/down for all windows, tire pressure monitoring, and cruise control. Additionally, it offers a 9-inch central touchscreen, dual rear USB ports, and automatic parking. 2. Space: In terms of body dimensions, the Mazda CX-4 measures 4633mm × 1840mm × 1535mm with a wheelbase of 2700mm, which is only average in its class, especially with its relatively cramped rear seating space, noticeably lagging behind the KAROQ. The KAROQ measures 4382mm × 1841mm × 1605mm with a wheelbase of 2688mm. 3. Powertrain: The Mazda CX-4 is equipped with two Skyactiv-G engines: a 2.0L and a 2.5L, with maximum power outputs of 116kW and 141kW, and peak torques of 202N·m and 252N·m, respectively. These are paired with either a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed automatic transmission. Both models feature the G-Vectoring Control acceleration vectoring system. The KAROQ, on the other hand, comes with a 1.2T and a 1.4T engine, mated to a 7-speed DSG dual-clutch transmission, and includes standard engine start-stop and brake energy recovery systems.

[DiJanelle]

I just bought a CX-4 mainly because it's incredibly smooth to drive, with quick power response and precise steering that gives you that rare 'horse and rider as one' feeling among SUVs. Whether on mountain roads or highways, you can clearly feel the precision in its handling. Although the space isn't the largest, it's more than enough for daily solo driving. In contrast, when I test-drove the Karoq, I found it more family-oriented—stable steering but lacking any surprises, better suited for those who prefer a conventional driving style. Fuel consumption is similar for both, with the CX-4 averaging around 7L, its standout feature being the well-optimized engine. The Karoq is also economical but lacks that bit of excitement. For long-term driving, I lean toward Mazda because of its youthful, sporty design, which significantly reduces driving fatigue. However, if you prioritize brand reliability, Škoda, backed by the Volkswagen Group, might have fewer minor issues. In short, choose Mazda for driving pleasure and the Karoq for comfort.