
Lynk & Co 03 has both three-cylinder and four-cylinder versions. Here is more information about Lynk & Co: 1. The Lynk & Co 03 uses two types of engines: a 1.5-liter turbocharged engine and a 2.0-liter turbocharged engine. The 1.5-liter turbocharged engine is a three-cylinder, while the 2.0-liter turbocharged engine is a four-cylinder. The Lynk & Co 03 is a compact sedan under the Lynk & Co brand, with a wheelbase of 2730 mm, and dimensions of 4639 mm in length, 1840 mm in width, and 1460 mm in height. 2. The 1.5-liter turbocharged engine of the Lynk & Co 03 delivers 180 horsepower and a maximum torque of 265 Nm. The engine's maximum power is achieved at 5500 rpm, and the maximum torque is available between 1500 to 4000 rpm. This engine features direct fuel injection technology and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. It is paired with a 7-speed dual-clutch transmission. 3. The 2.0-liter turbocharged engine produces 190 horsepower and a maximum torque of 300 Nm. The engine's maximum power is achieved at 4700 rpm, and the maximum torque is available between 1400 to 4000 rpm. This engine also features direct fuel injection technology and uses an aluminum alloy cylinder head and block. It is paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission. 4. The Lynk & Co 03 uses a MacPherson independent suspension at the front and a multi-link independent suspension at the rear. The multi-link independent suspension enhances the tire's ground contact performance, thereby improving traction.

I've driven the Lynk & Co 03, specifically the 1.5T three-cylinder version. It's quite fuel-efficient in city driving, averaging around 6-7 liters per 100 kilometers, and doesn't feel sluggish even in traffic jams. Some people say three-cylinder engines vibrate, but I think Lynk & Co has handled it well—the suspension and engine mounts work together to make the vibrations hardly noticeable. If you opt for the four-cylinder version like the 03+ with a 2.0T engine, the power is significantly stronger, with quicker acceleration and more responsive throttle, making it ideal for highway driving or those who enjoy spirited driving. The three-cylinder engine has a smaller displacement, lighter weight, and lower manufacturing costs, resulting in a more affordable price for the new car and simpler maintenance. It's more than sufficient for daily commuting. Nowadays, many compact cars use three-cylinder engines to reduce emissions. The Lynk & Co 03 offers the flexibility to choose between three-cylinder and four-cylinder options. A test drive before buying will help you decide which one suits your driving habits best and offers the best value for money.

I've studied the powertrain of the Lynk & Co 03. Different versions have varying numbers of cylinders. For example, the entry-level model is equipped with a three-cylinder 1.5T turbocharged engine, which has fewer cylinders and a higher compression ratio optimized for fuel efficiency in urban areas. The high-performance 03+ version uses a four-cylinder 2.0T engine with stronger power output and faster turbo response, providing stable high-rev performance. The number of cylinders affects weight and friction: three-cylinder engines are lighter but may have slight vibrations requiring NVH (Noise, Vibration, and Harshness) tuning for balance, while four-cylinder engines deliver more even power suitable for sporty driving. The actual engine layout combined with the transmission is crucial, and the hybrid version also integrates an electric motor to reduce emissions. When considering the number of cylinders for a car purchase, it's advisable to check the horsepower and torque curves to ensure smooth low-end response that matches your needs.

I chose the 1.5T three-cylinder version of the Lynk & Co 03 considering my budget. The three-cylinder engine has lower manufacturing costs, resulting in a cheaper new car price and lower fuel consumption averaging 6-7L per 100km. Maintenance costs are also less than the four-cylinder version, making it suitable for economical driving. The vibration issue isn't as severe as imagined, as Lynk & Co has handled it well with strong comfort performance. Opting for the four-cylinder would provide more power but likely increase fuel consumption to 8-9L with higher expenses. In the long run, the three-cylinder is more environmentally friendly, better suited for urban road conditions, and offers hassle-free practicality.


