How does the Roewe i5 compare with the Geely Emgrand in terms of the three major components?
3 Answers
The comparison between the Roewe i5 and the Geely Emgrand in terms of the three major components is as follows: Engine: The Geely Emgrand is equipped with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine, delivering a maximum horsepower of 109 HP and a peak torque of 142 Nm. The Emgrand's 1.5L JLY-4G15 engine is independently developed by Geely and features DVVT intelligent variable valve timing technology for both intake and exhaust, making it one of the leading engines among domestic brands. The Roewe i5 comes with two engine options: a 1.5L and a 1.5T, delivering maximum horsepower of 120 HP and 169 HP, and peak torque of 150 Nm and 250 Nm, respectively. These engines belong to the Blue Core series, co-developed by SAIC and General Motors, offering relatively good fuel economy and power performance, ranking among the top in domestic brands. Transmission: The Emgrand uses a 5-speed manual transmission and a CVT transmission. The CVT transmission is from the Belgian Punch brand, manufactured at the Nanjing Punch factory, which can simulate 6 "gears" and enable manual shifting, providing an automatic transmission at a low cost with decent overall performance. The Roewe i5's CVT transmission features main components supplied by Bosch and is independently developed by SAIC, while the dual-clutch transmission uses the VT2 product from Nanjing Punch. The CVT transmission in the Roewe i5 performs better in fuel economy compared to the dual-clutch and also supports manual shifting and simulates 8 gears. Chassis: The Roewe i5 adopts the same front MacPherson independent suspension and rear torsion beam non-independent suspension as the Geely Emgrand. This suspension configuration has undergone long-term market testing, ensuring overall quality with sufficient reliability.
I've driven both the Roewe i5 and the Geely Emgrand, and I have some thoughts. The Roewe comes with a 1.5L naturally aspirated engine that delivers strong acceleration, making it quick off the line and great for overtaking, though it's a bit thirstier on fuel, especially in stop-and-go city traffic. The Emgrand also has a 1.5L engine, but its output is smoother, making it more fuel-efficient and comfortable for daily commuting. Both cars use CVT transmissions, but the Emgrand's gear shifts feel more natural, with almost no noticeable jerkiness, while the i5 occasionally has a slight delay on small inclines, though it's generally fine. In terms of chassis and suspension, the i5 is tuned more for sportiness, offering strong cornering support, but it can feel a bit bumpy on rough roads. The Emgrand leans towards comfort, with a sofa-like ride that's easy on the body during long trips. Maintenance-wise, Emgrand parts are cheaper and easier to find, while the i5 is slightly more expensive. Overall, if you're young and like a punchy drive, go for the i5; if you prioritize practicality, the Emgrand is the better choice.
From an automotive enthusiast's perspective, the three major highlights of the Roewe i5 are its more powerful engine, higher performance parameters, and the noticeable push-back feeling when accelerating, making it suitable for young drivers who seek performance. The Emgrand, on the other hand, focuses on balance, with a linear engine output and a responsive CVT transmission that shows almost no lag. In terms of chassis suspension, the i5 has a stiffer design, offering direct handling and stability during high-speed cornering, but it transmits more vibrations on rough roads. The Emgrand's suspension is softer, providing excellent cushioning and stability over bumps, earning full marks for comfort. Additionally, the Emgrand has a good reputation for reliability, with fewer engine issues, while the i5's newer versions have seen significant improvements, though occasional reports of strange noises persist. In terms of fuel consumption, the Emgrand performs better overall, while the i5 can consume 10% more when driven aggressively. In summary, choose the i5 for spirited driving, and the Emgrand wins for comfortable commuting.
