
Haval M6 urban fuel consumption statistics are as follows: 1. 1.5T-6MT, actual fuel consumption of 9.69 liters per 100 kilometers, sample size 505. 2. 1.5T-6AT, actual fuel consumption of 10.49 liters per 100 kilometers, sample size 3470. 3. 2.0T diesel-6MT, actual fuel consumption of 7.42 liters per 100 kilometers, sample size 16. 4. 2.0T diesel-6MT, actual fuel consumption of 7.35 liters per 100 kilometers, sample size 619. 5. 2.0T-7DCT, actual fuel consumption of 10.63 liters per 100 kilometers, sample size 15. Based on the above data, the average actual fuel consumption for all Haval M6 models is calculated to be 9.972 liters per 100 kilometers.

I've been driving this Haval M6 in the city for almost two years now, often stuck in heavy traffic during rush hours with frequent traffic lights. The actual measured fuel consumption is basically 9-11L/100km, reaching 12L when using air conditioning in summer. Road conditions make a huge difference - when encountering road construction or school zones, the dashboard shows instant fuel consumption can spike to 15L, but drops to just over 8L on ring roads. I've found that driving more gently by maintaining distance from the car ahead and braking less can save me a full tank of fuel money each month. The 1.5T engine pulling this 1.6-ton body does show relatively high urban fuel consumption, but the spacious cabin can accommodate all the family's luggage, so it's a trade-off.

As someone who enjoys studying cars, I specifically tested the urban fuel consumption of the Haval M6. Its GW4G15F engine technology is not the latest, and the turbo lag at low speeds makes it particularly fuel-thirsty during frequent starts in city driving. I recorded data over three weeks: fuel consumption was 11-13 liters during peak morning and evening traffic, and around 9 liters during off-peak hours. The car weighs 1.6 tons, which is 200 kg heavier than sedans in the same class, consuming an extra 0.3 liters of fuel per traffic light start. The transmission tuning leans toward comfort, but the shift logic isn't smart enough in congested areas. I recommend installing a tire pressure monitor, as low tire pressure can increase fuel consumption by 5%. Maintaining a tire pressure of 2.3 bar is the most economical.

Last week, I helped a friend test drive his Haval M6, covering 150 kilometers entirely in urban areas. Starting at 9 a.m. from Chaoyang to Haidian, the displayed fuel consumption was 10.8 liters. During the evening rush hour return trip, being stuck in traffic for forty minutes caused it to jump directly to 12.3 liters. I noticed a pattern: short-distance trips when the engine hasn't warmed up are the most fuel-consuming, such as grocery runs within three kilometers, which can reach up to 14 liters. This car is most fuel-efficient at a steady speed of 60 km/h, but unfortunately, it's impossible to maintain that speed in the city. With a 53-liter fuel tank, it can run about 400 kilometers in pure urban driving before needing a refill, which is 20% lower than the official data.


