Do You Need to Replace the Spring When Changing the Shock Absorber?

[DiJocelyn]

Replacing the shock absorber does not require replacing the spring, as these are two different components. Therefore, when the shock absorber has issues, the spring does not need to be replaced together. The shock absorber is a type of wear-and-tear part and generally needs to be replaced every 100,000 kilometers or less. Signs of spring damage include: 1. The spring shows obvious cracks. While driving, it’s hard to predict what might happen to the shock absorber. If there are any hard objects stuck on it, there could be potential safety hazards. 2. The spring becomes deformed. Every time you drive, the spring is in operation. Although car springs are generally of good quality, it’s still better to be prepared for any eventuality. This is especially true for those who enjoy driving on mountain roads, where the conditions are relatively harsh, making the springs more prone to damage.

[AdalynnLee]

Whether to replace the springs when changing shock absorbers depends on the specific situation. Shock absorbers and springs are two separate components. Springs are responsible for supporting the vehicle's weight, while shock absorbers dampen vibrations. If the springs are still in good condition—no rust, deformation, or breaks—you can simply replace the shock absorbers and save the extra cost. However, springs can fatigue and degrade over time, especially with frequent driving, leading to reduced elasticity. Pairing old springs with new shock absorbers may affect suspension performance, making the car feel unstable or increasing noise. Therefore, it's advisable to have a mechanic inspect the springs first and confirm they're still good before keeping them. Although replacing both is more expensive, it offers peace of mind and reduces future maintenance hassles. During regular maintenance, pay attention to the condition of the springs. They generally last longer than shock absorbers, with a replacement interval of about 5 to 8 years being more reasonable.

[LeMason]

I personally think it's not necessary to replace the springs when changing shock absorbers, unless there are obvious issues with the springs. Springs are quite durable and can usually last for a decade or so. As long as they're not cracked or rusted, simply removing them for cleaning and reusing is perfectly fine. Spending extra hundreds on new springs isn't cost-effective for budget-conscious car owners. But remember to carefully inspect the springs' appearance: check for rust spots, deformation, or damage, and replace them only if problems are found. Pairing new shock absorbers with old springs might sometimes cause driving vibrations or discomfort, but if the impact is minor, it's still manageable. I always make it a habit to have mechanics evaluate the springs during routine maintenance—just ensure they're sturdy, and don't waste resources unnecessarily.

[StGemma]

You don't need to automatically replace the springs when changing shock absorbers. The springs are independent and can continue to be used as long as they are in good condition. The key is to check whether the springs are rusty, broken, or deformed: keep them if there are no issues; replace them if there are problems to ensure safety. Consult a professional mechanic for evaluation—they are knowledgeable and will help you decide. In most cases, if the springs are fine, don't waste money on unnecessary replacements.