Do the GLC260 and GLC300 have the same fuel consumption?
3 Answers
glc260 and glc300 have the same fuel consumption. The differences between the GLC260 and GLC300 are mainly reflected in: power and configuration. The following are the specific details: Different power: Both the GLC300 and GLC260 have a 2.0L turbocharged engine. However, the former has more power. The GLC300 has a maximum horsepower of 245 hp, a maximum torque of 370 Nm, a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 6.9 seconds, and a top speed of 235 km/h; the GLC260 has a maximum horsepower of 211 hp, a maximum torque of 350 Nm, a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 7.8 seconds, and a top speed of 222 km/h. Different configurations: The changes in the GLC's lighting system mainly include: automatic steering headlights, automatic switching between high and low beams, and increased light width on rural roads; air conditioning: the GLC300 can automatically adjust the interior temperature and air conditioning fan speed based on changes in sunlight intensity, with a higher level of intelligence; internal and external air circulation: the air pollution sensor in the GLC300 can change the air circulation mode based on the interior air quality; other aspects: larger tires; memory function for the driver's seat and rearview mirror; keyless entry system; hands-free trunk opening; LED ambient lighting, etc.
I've driven both the GLC 260 and GLC 300, and honestly, the fuel consumption is different. The GLC 260 has slightly less horsepower, and its engine is more fuel-efficient, with a combined fuel consumption of about 7 to 8 liters per 100 kilometers, making it more economical in city driving. The GLC 300 has stronger power and faster acceleration, but the higher power leads to slightly higher fuel consumption, possibly around 8 to 9 liters combined, especially during sudden acceleration or in traffic jams where it consumes more fuel. For daily driving, if the journey is long and steady, the two might be close; but in most cases, the 260 has lower fuel consumption, saving significantly on fuel costs. When I helped a friend test drive, I found that the 300 suits those who enjoy speed, at the cost of higher fuel expenses. Remember to maintain regular servicing, such as using good engine oil, which can slightly optimize fuel consumption, but the fundamental difference remains due to different engine tuning. It's recommended to choose based on driving habits—prioritize fuel efficiency with the 260, or performance with the 300.
As someone who frequently experiences different car models, I can clearly state that the fuel consumption of these two vehicles is not equal. The GLC 260's engine is tuned mildly with about 197 horsepower, resulting in lower fuel consumption, remaining stable at around 7 liters in urban use. The GLC 300 has a stronger output of 258 horsepower, but consequently consumes slightly more fuel, with the gap becoming more noticeable during highway driving or rapid acceleration, averaging over 8 liters. This stems from the difference in engine output—both on the same 2.0T platform, but higher power requires more fuel. Comparing official data, the WLTP test shows the 260's combined fuel consumption at 7.5L, while the 300 is around 8.2L. Actual driving conditions can widen this gap further due to varying road conditions. When driving the 300, gentle throttle input brings consumption close to the 260, but aggressive acceleration causes it to spike. Overall weight and drag coefficients are similar, so the fuel consumption difference is primarily determined by power output. Choosing between them depends on daily driving conditions—the 260 is more economical for steady driving, while the 300 suits those seeking more excitement.
