
Pulley weights vary from 4 grams to 12 grams, with original equipment typically around 7 grams. Lighter weights provide stronger acceleration feel at startup, while heavier weights enhance acceleration feel at higher speeds. Below is relevant information: Transmission: The weights do not affect top speed. As part of the transmission system, they don't increase power output and therefore don't improve vehicle speed. The choice depends on whether you need better performance in the initial, mid-range, or final acceleration phase - select weights according to your needs. Fuel consumption: Basically unaffected by the weights. The only possible fuel consumption impact would be choosing excessively heavy weights (making initial acceleration difficult and relatively fuel-inefficient) or excessively light weights (requiring gradual speed buildup at higher ranges, also relatively fuel-inefficient).

I've been into motorcycle modification for over a decade, and the belief that lighter variator weights give faster acceleration is a misconception. In CVT transmissions, the weights control the shifting timing - the lighter the weights, the higher the RPM needed to generate sufficient centrifugal force to move the pulley. While light weights make the engine rev up faster, they actually delay the ratio change. For example, on a stock 125cc scooter, switching to 5g light weights makes the take-off sluggish - it won't shift until 5000 RPM, and only then does mid-range acceleration become slightly sharper. For real acceleration improvement, using heavier weights to make the transmission engage earlier, combined with ignition modification, is the correct approach. Just changing to light weights actually disrupts the transmission balance.

After six years of commuting on a scooter and experimenting with various roller weight configurations, I've found that the claim 'lighter rollers provide faster acceleration' isn't entirely accurate—it largely depends on engine characteristics. For engines with strong low-end torque, lighter rollers do deliver quicker take-offs. However, with my old GY6 engine, switching to lighter rollers actually made the start-up feel sluggish. Lighter rollers delay the variator's shifting point, keeping the engine stuck in high RPM ranges, which not only increases fuel consumption but also causes belt squealing. In contrast, 12g medium-weight rollers paired with a straight-through exhaust offered the most balanced performance, delivering instant take-offs at traffic lights. Honestly, throttle response matters far more than top speed.

Research on motorcycle transmission systems reveals that the weight of the variator rollers affects the shifting curve. Lighter rollers require higher RPM to generate sufficient centrifugal force for ratio changes, leading to power wastage during initial acceleration. For example, 10-gram rollers engage the shift at 4000 RPM, while 5-gram rollers require 5500 RPM. Although the RPM climbs faster with lighter rollers, torque utilization efficiency decreases. For optimal acceleration, roller weight should match the engine's peak torque range. Typically, factory roller weights for small-to-medium displacement engines offer the most balanced performance—blindly reducing weight may result in sluggish low-speed response.

Veteran motorcycle mechanics often remind customers not to blindly trust lightweight rollers. While lighter rollers allow RPM to climb faster, they make the transmission ratio changes sluggish, akin to starting in a high gear. I've seen cases where people reduced roller weight from 13g to 8g on a 150cc scooter, only to find their 0-100km/h acceleration slowed by half a second. The key to good acceleration lies in keeping the rollers shifting within the engine's optimal RPM range—typically around 80% of peak power output. Heavier rollers move the shift point forward, allowing torque to be delivered earlier. Proper roller modification must be paired with clutch spring adjustments to be effective.


