Differences Between the 2009 and 2012 Highlander Models
3 Answers
Specific differences between the 2009 and 2012 Highlander models are as follows: 1. Differences in powertrain. The 2012 Highlander is a minor facelift of the 2009 Highlander. The maximum output power of the 2.7L engine in the 2012 Highlander is 138 kW, while the 2009 Highlander's 2.7L engine delivers 140 kW, representing a reduction of 2 kW. 2. Exterior design. The 2012 Highlander features modified headlights equipped with halogen bulbs, and its overall appearance is more stylish compared to the 2009 Highlander.
When it comes to the differences between the 2009 and 2012 Highlander models, as an automotive enthusiast who frequently drives both, I recall that the 2009 model was equipped with a 3.5L V6 engine producing approximately 270 horsepower, paired with a 5-speed automatic transmission. It delivered a smooth ride but had slightly higher fuel consumption, around 11L/100km in city driving. The 2012 model received minor optimizations, with engine tuning that improved fuel efficiency, saving about 1-2L/100km, and the transmission became smoother with reduced jerking during acceleration. In terms of interior, the 2009 model mostly featured a hard plastic dashboard and a traditional CD player, with limited infotainment options. The 2012 model upgraded to soft-touch materials and added an optional touchscreen system supporting Bluetooth audio connectivity, enhancing the overall feel. Space-wise, both generations are seven-seat SUVs with nearly identical dimensions, but the 2012 model had thicker seat cushioning, making long-distance driving more comfortable. During maintenance, it's worth noting that the 2012 model's electronic systems, such as ABS, may have been improved to avoid potential issues, which is quite important for used car buyers. I recommend test-driving both to feel the differences before purchasing, especially since finding a low-mileage 2012 model in the used market could offer better value.
After driving the 2009 and 2012 Highlander models, I noticed quite obvious changes in the details. The 2009 version has a more conservative exterior, with a simple front grille design and squarish bumper. The 2012 version, however, updated the front face with a more refined grille, more stylish headlights, and slightly redesigned taillights, making it look much more modern. Both models offer spacious interiors, suitable for family trips, but the 2012 version has better interior materials and softer seats, making long rides less tiring. The air conditioning system in the 2012 version was also optimized for more even airflow. In terms of safety, the 2009 model comes with standard ABS and dual airbags, while the 2012 version adds optional electronic stability control for steadier handling. Regarding fuel consumption, the 2012 model's slightly tuned engine saves a bit more fuel, especially on highways where it can save about half a liter per 100 kilometers. For maintenance, pay attention to checking the wiring aging in the 2012 model and consider professional shop tests to ensure reliability.
