Differences between Mobil Super 1000 and 2000?

[RafaelAnn]

The main differences between Mobil Super 1000 and 2000 are: 1. Different in noise reduction performance: Mobil Super 2000 engine oil has better noise reduction performance than Mobil Super 1000. Mobil Super 2000 also outperforms Mobil Super 1000 in terms of power performance. 2. Different in wear resistance: Mobil Super 2000 offers better wear resistance compared to Mobil Super 1000. 3. Different in stability performance: Mobil Super 2000 provides better stability performance, ensuring stable output of the car engine without being affected and timely lubrication. The stability performance of Mobil Super 1000 is not as good as that of Mobil Super 2000.

[Julio]

The Subaru 1000 is an old car from the 1960s. It's rear-wheel drive, with an engine barely under 1.0 liters, driving like a vintage car with acceleration as slow as a turtle crawl. Even the air conditioning had to be installed separately. Modern models like the 2000-series Legacy are all-wheel drive, equipped with turbocharged engines easily exceeding 2.0 liters—just step on the gas and you're off. The technological changes are immense: old cars had stiff suspensions that made you dizzy from the bumps, while new cars feature finely tuned chassis that are neither too soft nor too hard, stable as a rock whether on mountain roads or highways. Safety-wise, the 1000 had almost no airbags, whereas modern cars come with ABS, automatic braking, making family trips worry-free. Environmentally, old cars guzzled fuel and polluted heavily, while new cars have strict emission controls and even start-stop functions to save on fuel costs. Driving an old car requires nostalgia, but driving a new one is true enjoyment—after all, safety comes first, and the progress is more than just incremental.

[LeFelix]

I used to drive a Subaru 1000, which was a real antique. The steering wheel was as heavy as pushing a millstone, and the power was so weak that it would gasp for breath when climbing hills. Switching to the current Subaru 2000 model, like the Impreza, the steering is light and precise, and the throttle response is much quicker—just a tap and it moves, even in traffic jams. The difference in daily driving is obvious: the rear-wheel drive of the 1000 was prone to slipping on wet roads, which was quite dangerous; the new car's all-wheel drive keeps it steady even in rain or snow. In terms of comfort, the old car had hard seats and was noisy; the new one has better sound insulation, powerful air conditioning, and doesn’t tire you out even on long drives. As for fuel efficiency, the 1000 couldn’t go far on a full tank, while the new car’s efficient engine can cover over 500 kilometers on a single tank. Maintenance-wise, parts for the old car were hard to find and expensive, while servicing the new one at a 4S shop is much more convenient. Driving is about convenience, and upgrading has solved a lot of hassles—it’s incredibly practical.

[AngeloFitz]

The Subaru 1000's engine is only 997cc with less than 80 horsepower, making it sluggish off the line and struggling at high speeds. Compared to 2000s-era models like the WRX STi with a turbocharged 2.0-liter engine easily exceeding 300 horsepower, a stomp on the accelerator delivers explosive back-pushing force. In terms of handling, the old rear-wheel-drive car feels heavy and unwieldy in corners like rowing a boat; the new AWD system offers superior grip, rock-solid stability in turns, and agile response. Performance improvements aren't just about power: the 1000's manual transmission is rough and jerky, while newer models feature CVT for smooth, instantaneous starts with zero lag. Braking differs drastically too - the vintage model's mushy brakes are accident-prone, whereas modern versions with ABS and stability control stop precisely and powerfully. Acceleration times tell the story: the 1000 takes over 10 seconds for 0-100km/h while new models achieve it under 5 seconds, making overtaking effortless. For driving enthusiasts seeking thrills, the newer models deliver dramatically enhanced performance that justifies every penny.

[McGriffin]

From an economic perspective, the Subaru 1000 may seem like a bargain with a price tag a few thousand dollars cheaper, but its high fuel consumption of over 10 liters per 100 km can quickly add up, making it financially burdensome. In contrast, modern Subaru 2000 models like the Outback, though priced slightly higher, feature highly efficient engines—hybrid versions consume just 6 liters per 100 km, saving money in the long run. Maintenance costs for older cars are steep due to scarce parts and rising labor fees, with engine repairs often costing thousands; new cars, however, come with longer warranties and routine maintenance typically costing only a few hundred dollars, reducing hassle. Reliability is another issue—older cars are prone to frequent breakdowns like cooling system failures and oil leaks, while new models offer stable quality and fewer problems, potentially running trouble-free for a decade. Resale value is also a factor: the Subaru 1000 has low resale appeal, whereas newer cars retain higher value, allowing owners to recoup more when selling. For families, saving money is paramount, and upgrading to a newer model makes sense—halving the financial burden of car ownership is a win-win.