
Yes, you can lease a former rental car, but it's a decision that comes with significant trade-offs. The primary advantage is lower monthly payments compared to leasing a brand-new vehicle. However, these cars often have higher mileage and more wear and tear, which can lead to unexpected maintenance costs and affect your lease-end experience. It's crucial to understand that you are not leasing from the rental company directly; instead, you are leasing a used car from a dealership that acquired it at auction.
The biggest risk involves the vehicle's residual value—the estimated worth of the car at the end of the lease term. Since rental cars are driven hard by many different drivers, their condition and future value are less predictable. If the actual market value at lease-end is lower than the predetermined residual value, you could face charges for excess wear and tear or owe more than the car is worth if you decide to buy it.
| Consideration | New Car Lease | Former Rental Car Lease |
|---|---|---|
| Average Monthly Payment | Higher ($400 - $600) | Lower ($250 - $400) |
| Average Starting Mileage | 0 - 100 miles | 20,000 - 40,000 miles |
| Warranty Coverage | Full factory warranty | May have partial coverage remaining |
| Vehicle History | Pristine, single owner | Multiple drivers, unknown maintenance |
| Lease-End Flexibility | Standard wear/tear guidelines | Higher risk of excess wear charges |
Before signing, get an independent pre-purchase inspection from a trusted mechanic. Scrutinize the vehicle history report and confirm the remaining factory warranty. This path can save you money, but it requires more due diligence to avoid a problematic vehicle.

I looked into this last year. The payments are tempting, I'll give you that. But you have to think about how a rental car lives its life. People aren't gentle. They floor the gas from a stop, slam on the brakes, and probably never think about maintenance. You're basically leasing a car that's already had the roughest part of its life. For me, the risk of something breaking down and costing me out of pocket wasn't worth the monthly savings. I'd rather lease something newer and know its history.

From a financial perspective, leasing a former rental car is a calculated risk. The lower monthly payment improves your cash flow. However, you must factor in potential costs. The vehicle's higher initial mileage means it may need tires or brakes sooner. Also, the lease's residual value is a guess on a car with an unpredictable history. If that guess is wrong, you could owe money at the end. It's a budget-friendly option only if you proactively plan for these hidden expenses.

My brother-in-law works at a dealership that gets these cars at auction. He told me they're a mixed bag. Some are fine, just high-mileage commuters. Others have been rode hard. The problem is you never really know. He said the smartest move is to only consider one that's certified pre-owned (CPO) from a reputable brand. That way, it's passed a multi-point inspection and comes with an extended warranty. Without that CPO badge, he said it's too much of a gamble, even with the lower price.

Think of it like this: a lease payment is based on the car's depreciation. A new car loses value quickly but predictably. A former rental car has already taken that big initial hit, so your payments are lower. But its future depreciation is a wild card. How was the engine broken in? Was the transmission abused? This uncertainty is why banks are often hesitant to lease used cars, and the terms might not be as favorable. The savings are real, but you're trading a known cost (new car depreciation) for an unknown risk (used car reliability).


