
Yes, in almost every U.S. state, you can legally choose to only carry liability insurance on your car. This is often referred to as a "state minimum" policy. It's the most basic and affordable form of auto insurance because it doesn't cover your own vehicle; it only covers costs for others if you're at fault in an accident. This includes bodily injury liability (for medical expenses of other people) and property damage liability (for repairing someone else's car or property).
However, this decision carries significant financial risk. If you cause an accident, liability insurance will not pay for your own medical bills or the repairs to your car. You would be responsible for those costs out-of-pocket. This makes it a viable option primarily for older cars with very low market value, where the cost of full coverage (which includes comprehensive and collision) might exceed the car's worth.
It's also crucial to understand that each state sets its own minimum liability coverage limits, usually expressed as three numbers (e.g., 25/50/25). These limits can be surprisingly low and may not be enough to cover a serious accident, potentially leaving you personally liable for amounts that exceed your policy's cap.
| State | Minimum Bodily Injury Liability (per person / per accident) | Minimum Property Damage Liability | State Minimum Annual Premium (Estimate) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Florida | $10,000 / $20,000 | $10,000 | ~$850 |
| California | $15,000 / $30,000 | $5,000 | ~$650 |
| New York | $25,000 / $50,000 | $10,000 | ~$1,100 |
| Texas | $30,000 / $60,000 | $25,000 | ~$550 |
| Ohio | $25,000 / $50,000 | $25,000 | ~$450 |
Before opting for liability-only, honestly assess your financial situation. If you couldn't afford to replace your car or pay substantial medical bills unexpectedly, the higher monthly premium for full coverage might be a worthwhile investment for peace of mind.

Absolutely, you can. I only carry liability on my 15-year-old truck. The thing's barely worth two grand, so paying for collision coverage just doesn't make financial sense. The savings on the premium are huge. I just make sure I have a decent emergency fund set aside in case I ever mess up and need to fix or replace my own ride. It's a calculated risk that works for an old beater.

From a purely financial standpoint, yes, liability-only is an option. It's a trade-off between predictable monthly premiums and potential future risk. You're essentially self-insuring your own vehicle. This can be a sound strategy if the annual cost of full coverage is more than 10% of your car's current value. The key is to ensure your liability limits are high enough to protect your personal assets, like your savings or home, from a lawsuit.

You can, but think it through. I did it when I was younger and broke, and it was a constant worry. What if I slid on ice and hit a nice car? My insurance would cover their door, but I'd be walking. It's fine for a car you can afford to lose, but if your car is essential for getting to work, the risk might be too high. The peace of mind from having full coverage is worth a lot.


