
When waiting at a red light, automatic transmission cars can shift to neutral. The relevant explanations are as follows: 1. Shifting to neutral at a red light can reduce fuel consumption. In neutral, the passive wheel in the torque converter of the transmission is in an idle state, which does not increase the resistance of the active wheel connected to the engine. Without additional load, fuel consumption will not increase. 2. Shifting to neutral can also reduce engine wear. If the car is left in other gears, the driver needs to continuously press the brake, which will reduce the lifespan of the brake pads. 3. When in neutral, the handbrake can be engaged, allowing the driver to avoid continuously pressing the foot pedal and preventing fatigue. When waiting at a red light, the gear can be operated according to the following specific situations: 1. If the expected waiting time is less than 20 seconds: Drive gear + foot brake. 2. If the expected waiting time is more than 30 seconds: Neutral gear + handbrake. 3. If the expected waiting time is more than 2 minutes: Neutral gear + handbrake + turn off the engine.

As a seasoned driver who has been driving automatic transmission cars for years, I believe it's better not to shift to neutral at red lights. Safety should always come first: shifting to neutral disengages the transmission from the drive system, and if the brakes fail or your foot slips, the car could easily roll, especially on slopes. Even though modern cars have anti-rollback features, there's no need to take unnecessary risks. Keeping the car in D (Drive) while pressing the brake ensures a stable stop and allows for quick acceleration to avoid unexpected situations. Additionally, frequently shifting to N (Neutral) can increase wear on the gearshift mechanism, and repeated adjustments in transmission oil pressure might harm the car. From a convenience standpoint, red lights typically last anywhere from a few seconds to several dozen seconds—keeping the car in D with your foot on the brake is hassle-free and efficient. Remember, safe driving is key; putting up with this minor inconvenience is worth it. After decades of driving with this habit, I've never had any issues.

I've got some real-world experience with fuel efficiency. Some folks claim that shifting to neutral saves a bit of fuel, which might have worked better on older automatic transmissions since the engine load is lower at idle. But my new car uses advanced electronic fuel injection technology that optimizes fuel consumption when braking in D gear, making it essentially equal to N gear. Frequent gear changes actually consume more energy and accelerate component wear. In practical driving, traffic light stops are so brief that it's not worth the hassle. Transmission design accounts for prolonged stops, so brief waiting won't cause excessive wear. The tiny fuel savings aren't worth the potential risks. I've tested it several times, and the fuel gauge showed negligible difference, so I just keep my foot on the brake for convenience. During , the technician also advised minimizing gear lever movement – maintaining stability is the most cost-effective approach.

When driving, whether to shift to neutral at a red light depends on the situation. For short red lights lasting just a few seconds, I usually stay in Drive (D) with my foot on the brake, avoiding unnecessary operations. For longer stops over 30 seconds, I sometimes shift to Neutral (N) and engage the handbrake to give my foot a rest, but it's not mandatory. Automatic transmissions are designed for convenience and handle frequent starts and stops efficiently. Excessive gear shifting may accelerate wear on the shift mechanism and even trigger false alarms. Personally, I minimize shifting to avoid complications—safe starts are more important. As a beginner, I experimented with different methods, but now I've simplified my routine for ease. A car is just a tool; use it in the way that feels most comfortable without overthinking minor details.

From a technical perspective, modern automatic transmissions are quite intelligently designed. When stopped at a red light in D gear with the brake pedal pressed, the transmission fluid pressure remains stable, reducing unnecessary hydraulic fluctuations. Shifting to neutral causes the system to frequently readjust, potentially increasing component stress, especially in newer electronically controlled transmissions. For short red lights (e.g., under 15 seconds), there's no need to change gears at all; for longer stops exceeding one minute, I occasionally shift to N but always engage the parking brake to prevent accidents. Regarding fuel economy, the difference in engine idle consumption is negligible. Vehicle manuals typically recommend minimizing gear changes to prolong transmission life. I've driven my car this way for years without issues. Simple suffices - no need for extra maneuvers.

My driving experience is: For automatic transmissions, staying in D gear and holding the brake at red lights is the safest approach. In the past, I also thought shifting to neutral could save fuel, but real-world tests showed no significant difference—it only added unnecessary complexity. Transmission designs account for brief stops, so maintaining the current gear won’t harm the car; shifting to N might accelerate wear on the gearshift mechanism. From a safety perspective, staying in D with the brake applied ensures instant responsiveness, eliminating rollback risks—especially critical on rainy days or slopes. For short stops, endure briefly; for longer waits, use the handbrake. This method balances economy and practicality. After a decade of driving, adopting this habit has drastically reduced issues—sharing it here for reference.


