Are the Three Major Components of the Vision and Emgrand the Same?

[LilahFitz]

Geely Vision and Geely Emgrand use the same three major components, with only slight adjustments in parameters. The similarities and differences between the Geely Vision and Emgrand are as follows: Similarities between Vision and Emgrand: Both cars use the same configuration for the engine, transmission, and suspension, and both are positioned as compact sedans. The Emgrand and Vision are both equipped with a 1.5L inline 4-cylinder naturally aspirated engine, paired with either a 5-speed manual or CVT continuously variable transmission. Both cars feature a MacPherson strut front suspension and a torsion beam rear suspension. Differences between Vision and Emgrand: In terms of body dimensions, the Vision measures 4599x1747x1482mm with a wheelbase of 2615mm, while the Emgrand measures 4632x1789x1470mm with a wheelbase of 2650mm.

[VivianLynn]

Having studied cars for many years, I've found that the Vision and Emgrand share many similarities in their core components, though not identical. As models under Geely's umbrella, they often share engines, such as that 1.5L naturally aspirated unit delivering comparable power output, though the Emgrand may feel slightly smoother in tuning. For transmissions, both manual and automatic variants use Geely's in-house CVT, known for reliable durability with similar daily shifting experiences. Their chassis platforms sometimes overlap – early models utilized the BMA architecture with decent stability, though the Emgrand's suspension leans more toward comfort. This design approach helps reduce manufacturing/maintenance costs with good parts commonality, saving money on repairs. However, nuanced differences exist: targeting the mid-range market, the Emgrand may feature reinforced framing. For buyers, the Vision offers budget-friendly value, while the Emgrand justifies its premium for those prioritizing refinement.

[DelColin]

I've driven both the Emgrand and Vision for quite some time, and feel their three major components are quite consistent. They share the same 1.5L engine with similar power response, and fuel consumption is around 7L/100km. As for transmissions, both use CVT or manual options that operate smoothly, though the Emgrand is quieter at highway speeds. Their chassis structures are similar too - both feature front MacPherson strut and rear torsion beam suspensions, providing stable handling and decent comfort on bumpy roads. Many maintenance parts like bearings and connectors are interchangeable, which saves money and hassle. However, the Emgrand has a more refined interior and premium driving feel, while the Vision is more economical and practical. For frequent long-distance driving, I'd recommend the Emgrand for its better aerodynamic design that slightly improves fuel efficiency. Overall, sharing major components benefits regular car owners by reducing maintenance costs and making model transitions easier.

[StElias]

Before buying the Vision or Emgrand, I compared the three major components. The engines are basically the same model, fuel-efficient and reliable. The transmission uses the same CVT design with fewer faults. The chassis structures are similar, suitable for family daily use. This sharing strategy reduces costs, with the entry model priced at just tens of thousands, maintenance is also cheap, and parts have strong compatibility. The Emgrand is positioned a bit higher-end, slightly more expensive but with no significant difference in quality, core components keep Geely competitive. Choosing depends on budget: Vision is cost-effective, Emgrand holds value better, the shared design is truly smart.