Are People Who Fail Subject 2 Stupid?

[DeJace]

There is no such thing as being stupid for those who fail Subject 2. Even if you fail Subject 2 four times, you should not give up and must persist in taking the test. The reasons for this are as follows: Not yet five attempts: You haven't reached the red line set by the traffic management bureau, which allows five failed attempts before requiring re-registration. According to the traffic management bureau's regulations, each person has a total of five chances to fail during the examination process. If all five chances are used up without passing, then unfortunately, the student needs to pay again and retake the test as a new candidate. Therefore, failing Subject 2 four times is not a big deal; there is still one more chance to pass, waiting for the student to try. Subject 2 cannot be avoided: To obtain a driver's license, Subject 2 is an unavoidable hurdle. The logic of taking the driver's license test is different from that of the college entrance examination. In the college entrance examination, if a student is weak in one subject, they can compensate with their stronger subjects, allowing them to still get into a good school overall. In contrast, the driver's license test does not allow for such compensation. It can be said that students must pass each of the four sections with a decent score; otherwise, they will not obtain a driver's license.

[McNicole]

Over the years as an instructor, I've seen all kinds of trainees. Failing the Subject 2 driving test really has nothing to do with IQ. Last time, there was a programmer trainee with exceptional logical skills, but he kept hitting the lines during reverse parking—simply because he turned the steering wheel a few seconds too late. Test anxiety is extremely common; in the waiting area, some people's hands shake so badly they can't even buckle the seatbelt properly. Familiarity with the test site is also crucial. For instance, the slope gradient at our training ground differs by two degrees from the exam site, making hill starts prone to stalling. My advice to those who failed: don't be too hard on yourself. Focus on recording practice sessions to review your movement rhythm, and study those three yellow lines at the test site as attentively as you would your girlfriend—it's definitely more helpful than self-doubt.

[MacLayla]

Having invigilated driving tests for over a decade, I've witnessed countless examinees break down in tears. About 80% of those who fail parallel parking by crossing lines do so because their rearview mirrors weren't properly adjusted. As for timed parallel parking, most failures result from excessive hesitation. Just last week during rainfall, over twenty candidates misjudged the 30cm boundary line due to pavement glare - can we really call them stupid? The core issue lies in inadequate standardization of instruction. For instance, some coaches only teach students to align the wiper with markers, yet varying wiper speeds during rain significantly impact judgment. My recommendation: use a soft tape measure to physically verify boundary distances until muscle memory develops - far more effective than rote memorization of reference points.

[VonElle]

Just took my daughter for her driving test (Subject 2), she failed all four mock exams. I noticed the clutch travel distance of the driving school's old Jetta differs by 2cm from the exam vehicle - it stalls with just a light press. She passed after renting the same model to practice for three hours. This exposes a pain point in driver education: inconsistency between training and exam vehicles. Nowadays, driving schools cut costs by using retired vehicles, like older model cars without auto-correction for reverse parking where early/late steering makes obvious differences. I really want to criticize some driving schools for needing equipment upgrades - don't make students bear the consequences.