Browse
Log in / Register
Share
May 9, 2026 — Dacia’s tiny Hipster EV is getting closer to a production decision, but it’s still not a done deal. A new report from Motor1 says the four-seat electric city car could go on sale in the UK in 2027 with an estimated starting price of £9,500. The project needs final sign-off from Renault Group, and Dacia has not officially confirmed any mass-production plans.
The Hipster was revealed on October 6, 2025, as a concept car. At the time, Dacia called it a study in extreme space efficiency and did not announce plans to build it. Now, with a possible 2027 launch window, the small EV is moving from styling exercise to product proposal.
If production moves forward, the Hipster would likely be classified as an L7e vehicle. That European light-road vehicle category allows a curb weight of up to 450 kg without the battery, a continuous rated power of just 15 kW, and a top speed of 90 km/h. It is the same regulatory space occupied by the Citroën Ami and other compact urban quadricycles.
Those limits make the Hipster less of a conventional car and more of a legal and practical bridge between a micro-mobility device and a proper automobile. Its dimensions — 3.0 m long, 1.55 m wide, and 1.53 m high — reinforce that positioning. Four passengers can fit inside, which is remarkable for a vehicle shorter than a Smart Fortwo.
Dacia design director David Durand is apparently on board with turning the Hipster into a real product. He expects that a finalized production version could be shown as early as 2027. But he also stressed that corporate approval from Renault Group management is still required.
Durand also hinted at construction details. Plastic body panels, similar in concept to those used on the Citroën Ami, could work well for a vehicle of this type. Interestingly, he acknowledged that plastic panels are actually more expensive than conventional steel stampings, which is a notable admission from a brand known for low prices.
That tension between budget goals and unconventional materials is exactly why the Hipster project remains under review. It cannot simply be an exercise in cost cutting; it also needs to be structurally interesting enough to justify the investment.
One of the strongest signals that the Hipster might get built is the manufacturing angle. Motor1 reports that production could take place in Shiyan, China, at the same plant that built the first-generation Dacia Spring. That plant already has experience with budget EVs for global distribution.
Frank Marotte, Dacia’s senior vice president of global sales, marketing, and operations, supports keeping the Shiyan facility active. He cites competitive production costs and the plant’s ability to innovate as key reasons. The factory has annual capacity of up to 45,000 vehicles for Renault Group, which is modest but realistic for a niche model like the Hipster.
Building the Hipster in China would also help Renault Group maintain a production footprint in a market where EV manufacturing costs remain significantly lower than in Europe. It would mirror the strategy used for the Dacia Spring, which was sold across Europe but produced in China.
Unconfirmed specifications point to a battery capacity of about 15 kWh. That would put the Hipster in the same energy range as vehicles like the original Dacia Spring and the Citroën Ami, giving it enough range for urban commuting without the added cost of a larger pack.
The interior is designed around space efficiency. With all four seats upright, the trunk offers roughly 70 liters of cargo space. Fold down the rear row and that number expands to around 500 liters. For a 3-meter vehicle, that kind of flexibility would make it genuinely useful in dense city environments.
These battery and cargo figures have not been officially confirmed. Dacia has so far declined to answer questions about the model’s technical details, and the entire program could still be cancelled or reshaped before launch.
For American readers, the Hippster’s L7e classification is the key takeaway. The United States has no equivalent category for quadricycles at that specification level. Federal safety standards for passenger cars would require substantial engineering changes, including additional crash protection and more power, before a vehicle like this could be sold on U.S. roads.
Dacia also has no dealer network in North America, and Renault Group has not signaled any interest in bringing the brand back to the United States. That means the Hipster is unlikely to appear in American showrooms in its current form.
Still, the Hipster serves as a useful indicator of where global automakers think affordable electric mobility is heading. As battery costs fall and cities push for smaller, more efficient vehicles, low-speed light EVs could play a bigger role beyond Europe. U.S. buyers may not get the Hipster itself, but the design language and packaging strategies could influence future small EVs sold here through other brands.
Despite the optimistic timeline from Dacia’s design team, the final decision rests with Renault Group’s senior management. Dacia has a reputation for producing no-frills cars at extremely low prices, and the Hipster fits that brand mission. But the business case for a $12,000-ish city car is far from simple, especially with production located in China and materials costs running higher than expected.
If the project is approved, the Hipster would likely become one of the most affordable EVs in Europe, undercutting many current city cars. If it is not approved, Dacia will still have produced one of the most talked-about concept cars of the decade.
For now, the Hipster remains exactly what Dacia first showed the world: a clever, compact idea waiting for a corporate green light.
