Browse
Log in / Register
Share
June 4, 2026 — A 17-year-old driver whose car careened off Parsik Hill and landed on railway tracks had allegedly bought the Honda City using an 18-year-old friend's documents, police said. The revelation has shifted scrutiny from the crash itself to a paper trail that led to a friend named Pranav Gavhane.
The accident happened at about 3:30 p.m. on September 24 near the Vishwanath Maharaj Samadhi Memorial Temple at Parsik Hill, a hilly stretch in Navi Mumbai, just outside India's financial capital. The teenager, from the nearby Turbhe area, was driving toward the tunnel near CBD Belapur railway station when he lost control. The car fell off the slope and ended up between the Belapur-Uran railway tracks.
The vehicle missed the overhead electric wires, which almost certainly prevented an even bigger disaster. Rescue crews had to cut the boy out of the wreckage. He was seriously injured and was taken to a hospital. Police have not shared an update on his medical condition.
The crash caused significant disruption. Local trains on the Belapur-Uran route were stopped for nearly three hours while the car was lifted from the tracks and safety checks were carried out. Commuters on that connecting line faced delays until normal service resumed.
When investigators began checking how the teenager got the vehicle, they found a second-hand Honda City had been bought for Rs 1.90 lakh, roughly $2,300. The problem was the buyer's age: 17. A legal driving licence is not possible before 18 in India.
According to police, the transaction was completed using the documents of Pranav Gavhane, a friend of the teenager who had just turned 18. The documents appear to have been used to get the sale registered without drawing attention to the minor's identity.
Police have filed a case against Gavhane for allegedly helping the minor buy the car and handing it over even though he knew the boy was not allowed to drive. Because the main suspect in the driving incident is still a minor, police have not released his name publicly.
A curious point in the probe is that Gavhane reportedly never saw the car himself, despite his documents being central to the sale. Police are trying to determine whether he merely lent his papers as a favor or was actively involved in arranging the deal.
If Gavhane knew the documents would be used to hide the age of the buyer, he could face more serious consequences. Police are checking his communication records and any financial links between him and the minor to see how the plan was set up.
The next part of the inquiry is about money. The police want to know who came up with the Rs 1.90 lakh and whether the teenager's family had any role in the purchase. Detectives are tracing bank transactions, cash withdrawals, and conversations between the people involved.
The family's awareness is central because Indian law holds guardians responsible for minors who get behind the wheel. If anyone in the family supported the purchase or knew the car was being driven, they may be brought into the case. Police have not yet said whether that will happen.
India's Motor Vehicles Act treats juvenile driving cases harshly. A guardian or vehicle owner who allows a minor to drive can be held guilty in a crash case. In some cases, the minor can be denied a driver's licence until age 25, and the vehicle's registration can be cancelled.
Legal experts say an adult who helps a minor acquire a car and then hands it over can also be treated as someone who enabled the offence. That is likely the legal frame around Gavhane's case, though the final charges may depend on what the police can prove.
Police are also looking at the car dealer who sold the Honda City. The dealer's part is being examined to determine whether proper documentation was collected before the keys were handed over and whether anyone helped the teenager bypass the usual age and identity checks.
No action against the dealer has been announced so far, but investigators have indicated that the role of other people connected to the vehicle purchase remains under review.
The investigation is continuing. Police are expected to record statements from the friend, the dealer, and possibly family members as they work out the sequence of events. The source of the money remains one of the main missing pieces.
Because minor drivers cannot legally own or register a vehicle, this case raises broader questions about how cars can slip through procedural gaps. The police have not announced any timeline for the follow-up action.
For now, the Parsik Hill crash is being treated not only as a serious road accident but also as a case of an adult helping a teenager get a car that should never have been driven by him. The outcome may offer a clearer example of the responsibility that comes with lending a name and documents.
