Share

April 10, 2025 — A simmering dispute over who should operate critical air ambulances for the Channel Islands has escalated into a full-blown court battle. The government of Guernsey stands accused of bypassing its own purchasing regulations when it awarded a lucrative five-year emergency medical flight contract to Gama Aviation in August 2020. The legal challenge, filed this week in the island’s Royal Court, alleges that the Health and Social Care Committee (HSC) failed to follow the States of Guernsey’s procurement code, raising questions about transparency and fairness in a tender process that affects lives on two islands.
At the heart of the case is the replacement of the previous air ambulance provider—a move that stunned local healthcare observers. Critics argue that the HSC’s decision lacked the required competitive scrutiny and deviated from mandated evaluation criteria. “This isn’t about a simple commercial disagreement; it’s about whether the public can trust that life-saving services are awarded based on rules that apply equally to all bidders,” said an attorney familiar with the suit, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the ongoing litigation. The complainant, believed to be the incumbent provider or a failed bidder, insists that the contract was rushed through without proper documentation.
The controversy carries significant weight because the air ambulance service covers not only Guernsey but also Jersey, making it a shared lifeline for approximately 170,000 residents across both jurisdictions. Gama Aviation, a global firm with a long track record in air medical transport, took over operations amid public praise for its modern fleet. However, questions have lingered about the tendering process. In a 2023 internal audit, the States’ own scrutiny unit flagged “insufficient evidence” that the HSC had fully complied with procurement rules, though no corrective action was taken at the time.
Legal experts are now studying the case as a potential precedent for how small island governments handle emergency contracts. “You often see smaller administrations struggling to balance speed and rigor in procurement, especially when lives are at stake,” noted Dr. Elaine Marchetti, a public procurement specialist at the University of Southern California. “But the legal standard is clear: even in urgent situations, you cannot skip competitive steps unless a formal waiver is issued.” No such waiver was publicly documented in Guernsey’s case.
Guernsey’s government has yet to file a formal response in court, but initial statements from the HSC have defended the process as “robust” and compliant with the States’ legal framework. A spokesperson reiterated that the contract was awarded following a “thorough evaluation of technical capability and cost.” Meanwhile, Gama Aviation has declined to comment on the litigation, noting that it remains fully focused on service delivery.
The court is expected to set a hearing date within the next 30 days. Should the challenge succeed, it could force a re-tender of the contract, potentially delaying service improvements that had been scheduled for 2026. Jersey’s government, which jointly funds the service, is watching closely but has not intervened in the legal proceedings so far.
Beyond the Channel Islands, the dispute underscores a broader trend: mounting legal scrutiny of government contracts for essential services, including air ambulances, which often operate on thin margins and tight timelines. In the United States, similar challenges have led to reforms in state-level emergency medical procurement, suggesting that the Guernsey case may offer lessons for regulators elsewhere. For now, residents on both islands can only wait—and hope that the legal fight does not compromise the rotor blades that bring help when every second counts.









