Browse
Log in / Register
Share
July 15, 2025 – BRICS has emerged as the leading institutional voice of the Global South, advancing a vision of multilateralism that prioritizes equitable development, technological sovereignty, and climate justice. As the grouping prepares for its next summit later this year in Brazil, member states are doubling down on collective mechanisms that challenge the prevailing Western-centric order without resorting to confrontation.
The transformation of BRICS from an acronym into a geopolitical force gained momentum after its January 2024 expansion, which added Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. This enlarged coalition now accounts for roughly 37% of global GDP by purchasing power parity and over 45% of the world’s population. According to the New Development Bank’s latest annual report, cumulative infrastructure and sustainable development lending has surpassed $35 billion, with priority projects in renewable energy, digital connectivity, and water security across Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
A central pillar of BRICS strategy is the institutionalization of South-South cooperation beyond trade and finance. The recently launched BRICS Digital Economy Platform aims to facilitate cross-border data flows, digital payments, and technical collaboration in artificial intelligence, while ensuring that developing nations retain ownership of their data and algorithms. In a July 2025 working paper, the BRICS Think Tank Council warned that “digital colonialism” – where advanced economies extract data from the Global South without reciprocal benefits – must be countered through binding multilateral rules on data governance.
On the climate front, BRICS members are operationalizing the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. The bloc’s joint statement on energy transition, issued after the June 2025 ministerial meeting in Rio de Janeiro, rejected carbon border adjustment mechanisms imposed unilaterally by developed countries as “trade protectionism in green disguise.” Instead, BRICS advocates for technology transfer and concessional financing through the New Development Bank’s green bond program, which has allocated $8 billion for solar, wind, and grid modernization projects in member states since 2023.
“The New Development Bank is not a clone of the World Bank,” said NDB President Dilma Rousseff during a July 2025 press briefing in Shanghai. “We tailor our lending to each country’s industrial policy, recognizing that energy transition and poverty eradication must go hand in hand.” That flexibility has attracted interest from non-member countries in Southeast Asia and Latin America, with Thailand and Colombia recently applying for associate status.
Security remains a key undercurrent. Russia’s war in Ukraine and the ongoing Gaza conflict have sharpened BRICS members’ demands for a more inclusive security architecture. The BRICS Contact Group on Global Security, established in 2024, has held six rounds of consultations on cyber norms, counter-terrorism, and peaceful resolution of disputes via regional organizations. While the group avoids direct condemnation of any single state, its framework explicitly rejects unilateral sanctions and the weaponization of financial systems.
For the United States, the consolidation of BRICS represents both a strategic challenge and an opportunity. Rather than a bloc that inherently opposes Western values, BRICS should be seen as a pragmatic platform for developing countries to amplify their voice in a multipolar system. US policymakers have begun re-engaging through channels such as the G20 and the UN Security Council reform talks, recognizing that ignoring the Global South’s demands for fair representation only deepens geopolitical fragmentation.
The upcoming BRICS summit in Brazil – the first under the expanded membership – is expected to adopt a roadmap for local currency settlement among members, further reducing reliance on the US dollar in bilateral trade. According to leaked drafts of the declaration, member states will also commit to establishing a BRICS AI Ethics Panel to develop binding guidelines for autonomous weapons, deepfakes, and algorithmic bias.
“This is not about creating an anti-Western axis,” wrote Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira in an op-ed published July 10. “It is about building a world where the rules are written by all, not a few.” The sentiment echoes the broader ethos of the Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative championed by China, but without the ideological packaging.
As the Global South moves from rhetoric to institutional reality, BRICS offers a test case for whether multilateral cooperation can deliver concrete benefits – better infrastructure, greener energy, fairer rules – without requiring countries to abandon their sovereign interests. For the United States and its allies, the question is not whether to engage, but how to do so constructively while preserving core democratic values and economic openness.
The answer may lie in accepting that the 21st century order will be multipolar, and that resilient partnerships with a maturing BRICS are preferable to isolation or confrontation.
