Share

As Chinese electric vehicles accelerate their global expansion, an unlikely region has emerged as a vital proving ground: Australia. According to Nathan Gore-Brown, founder of Test EV and Australasian distributor for Austrian battery diagnostics firm Aviloo, Australia and New Zealand are receiving Chinese-built EVs earlier, and sometimes in different configurations, than Europe. This unique position is turning the continent into a "pointy end of the spear" for real-world data collection on these models. July 23, 2024
Traditionally, automotive technology has flowed from established hubs like Europe, North America, and Japan to other markets. The rise of Chinese EVs is flipping this dynamic in the Australian context. Gore-Brown explains that his team is no longer just importing testing protocols from overseas. Instead, they are pioneering diagnostic procedures locally for vehicles from brands like BYD and others, generating foundational data that is then sent back to Aviloo's headquarters in Vienna. This reverse flow of technical knowledge marks a significant shift for a market once seen as merely a recipient of finished products and hand-me-down tech.
The case of the Kia EV5 SUV is a prime example. The model was tested and its diagnostic routines developed in Australia upon its 2024 launch there. However, when it arrived in Europe later, it was a Korean-built version with notable differences, including its battery chemistry. This discrepancy underscores why on-the-ground testing in early-adopter markets like Australia is becoming indispensable for global firms aiming to understand the full spectrum of vehicle performance.
Gore-Brown's extensive background, spanning engineering roles at Jaguar and Aston Martin to launching Tesla's first Brisbane store, provides a critical edge. This deep vehicle engineering expertise allows his team to interpret complex data streams from both the car and Aviloo's diagnostic device, offering insights that go beyond surface-level readings. The core of Aviloo's value proposition lies in its method of assessing battery health. Unlike standard systems that simply report a vehicle's own internal "state of health" estimate—a figure Gore-Brown calls inconsistent and often overly optimistic—Aviloo's system uses a machine-learning model.
This model is calibrated against full discharge-cycle tests and analyzes roughly 25 separate data points to generate a certified assessment. This approach aligns with the energy-based principles of the UN's GTR 22 regulation. Test EV's data suggests a significant gap in this area: approximately one in ten tested vehicles shows a difference of over 10 percentage points between the car's reported battery health and its actual capacity.
"The volume of data involved defeats manual inspection," Gore-Brown notes. He highlights instances where a sensor might miss a single data point in a rapid 200-millisecond cycle—a glitch invisible to a driver or a standard scan tool but detectable by Aviloo's system, which expects and monitors for every cyclical data point. With over a million tests conducted globally, this data is creating a sophisticated feedback loop that refines battery aging models, incorporating factors like local operating conditions.
Australia's diverse and often extreme climate is proving to be a major factor in this research. Early data, including figures from auction house Pickles, indicates measurable differences in how battery packs degrade in the hot climate of Queensland compared to the milder conditions of Melbourne or Tasmania. These location-specific degradation patterns are now being integrated into Aviloo's global correlation models, offering valuable insights for markets worldwide with varying climates.
The testing process faces hurdles, primarily related to data accessibility from the vehicles themselves. "Some vehicles are very data rich, and some vehicles are a bit data poor," Gore-Brown admits. Certain Chinese brands restrict access to detailed data streams, making it challenging to produce a complete cell voltage heat map. However, the system can still detect battery imbalances and infer results from available data. To overcome this limitation and be closer to the source of production, Aviloo is establishing an office in China, reflecting the country's shift from a regional novelty to a global automotive volume leader.
Exclusive Perspective: Implications for the U.S. Market
This Australian testing narrative holds critical lessons for the United States. As Chinese EV brands like BYD actively scout for U.S. factory locations and consider market entry, the diagnostic data and real-world performance metrics being generated in Australia are a strategic asset. For U.S. regulators, insurers, and second-hand buyers, understanding the true, verified battery health of an EV—not just its in-dash estimate—will be paramount. The Australian experience demonstrates that early, independent, and rigorous testing in a demanding environment is key to building reliable battery health benchmarks. This could pressure U.S. diagnostic firms to adopt similarly rigorous, data-driven approaches rather than relying on manufacturer-reported figures, ultimately leading to greater transparency and consumer protection in the American EV ecosystem.
For now, the information flow between Australia and the global headquarters is bidirectional. "We're taking back that information from our local area," Gore-Brown says. This positions Australia not just as a consumer market, but as an active creator of next-generation EV diagnostic capability. How long this unique role lasts depends on the continued earlier arrival of Chinese models in Australasia or on how quickly global firms like Aviloo can embed their operations directly within China's manufacturing ecosystem.









