Browse
Log in / Register
Share
New Delhi, June 3, 2026 — Two Delhi University (DU) students, Abhinav and Abhimanyu, have been taken into custody by police in northwest Delhi after an alleged harassment incident involving Hindu College students. A sports utility vehicle connected with the case has also been impounded. Both accused are enrolled at Delhi University, a fact that adds an uncomfortable layer to a case that has already unsettled the North Campus community.
The detention and the seizure
The suspects were picked up after a complaint was registered relating to the alleged harassment. Police have not disclosed detailed facts, but the SUV is believed to have been used in or connected with the incident. The vehicle has been moved to a police facility, where it will be examined by forensic and technical teams. Investigators are yet to reveal the sections of law under which action has been taken, and a detailed public statement from the force has not been made so far.
Who are the accused
Abhinav and Abhimanyu have been identified as students of Delhi University. Their specific courses and colleges have not been confirmed in the thin details available so far. Because the university is spread across more than 90 colleges and many departments scattered across the capital, establishing the academic affiliations of students involved in a police case can take some time, especially when a territory-level police station is handling the paperwork.
Hindu College and the North Campus
Hindu College, founded in 1899 and one of Delhi University's oldest institutions, sits at the heart of the North Campus area. Every day, thousands of students attend lectures, walk through the narrow lanes around the college, and use public transport in the surrounding stretch. The reported harassment took place in this dense part of the city, where incidents often leave bystanders uncertain about who should intervene or how quickly help can arrive.
Safety concerns, again
The incident raises fresh questions about student safety around DU campuses, a subject that has triggered student protests multiple times in the past decade. Parents' groups and student unions have routinely called for better policing, street lighting, and crowd management. The fact that the accused are themselves DU students makes the conversation more awkward, but not less necessary, for the university administration and its disciplinary machinery.
Laws and process
The legal framework governing such cases has changed in India. The Indian Penal Code was replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on July 1, 2024. Offences such as wrongful confinement, criminal intimidation, and stalking — including any form of harassment on public roads — now fall under the new code. Courts decide on bail based on the nature of the allegation, the evidence collected, and whether the accused appears to be a repeat offender. For now, nothing is publicly known about the past records of the two suspects.
What the university can do
Delhi University's internal rules allow the administration to act against students for conduct that harms the university's reputation, but such action typically begins after police investigations are underway or completed. In most cases, the university awaits a police report before deciding on disciplinary proceedings. A statement from the varsity has not been made public yet, and it is unclear whether a committee will be set up to review the matter once the full sequence of events is known.
Investigation ahead
The Delhi Police is in the early stages of its probe. Officers are gathering statements from the complainants and possible witnesses, and the impounded SUV will be checked for relevant evidence. Electronic evidence, including phone and location records, is routinely reviewed in cases of this nature. Nothing has been formally concluded, and the two individuals remain suspects rather than convicts under the law.
A wider institutional gap
Legal experts say harassment on public roads sits in a grey zone between a university's disciplinary powers and police responsibility. University anti-harassment cells primarily address complaints arising within institutional settings or organised university events; incidents that happen on public premised fall almost entirely to the police. Activists have long argued that this gap leaves students exposed to repeated misbehaviour before the system responds effectively.
Sore points and solutions
Over the years, suggestions have included mapping unsafe hotspots, installing cameras at strategic locations, and stationing women-help desks at common gates. Some measures have been implemented, but students say consistency is missing. This newest incident is likely to test whether authorities are ready to act on long-standing demands rather than respond only after another event has forced the issue onto the agenda.
Ground reality
The streets around Hindu College and other North Campus institutions do not have uniform infrastructure. Some segments are wide and well lit; others are narrow, with shadowed corners and heavy vehicle movement. This mixed environment makes it harder for both students and law enforcement to pinpoint where trouble is most likely to occur. A spatial analysis of past complaints, local advocates have often suggested, would be a more useful starting point than episodic patrols.
Conclusion
For the two detained DU students, the coming days will be defined by legal formalities and police procedures. For the university and the police, the incident is another reminder that campus safety extends well beyond the college gate. The case is being watched closely by thousands of students whose daily routes pass through the same streets where the alleged harassment took place.
