Share
For home buyers, the single most important factor in choosing a real estate website is whether it provides direct access to the Multiple Listing Service (MLS), the primary database used by real estate brokers. A website with MLS integration will consistently show significantly more listings—and more detailed, accurate information—than sites relying on individual broker feeds. This core conclusion, drawn from industry analysis, means that bypassing the MLS can cause buyers to miss a substantial portion of available homes.
The MLS is a centralized, collaborative database maintained by real estate professionals in a given market. Virtually all properties listed by real estate brokers are entered into their local MLS, making it the most comprehensive source of active listings. Websites that pull data directly from the MLS, often through a brokerage relationship, have access to the full inventory of broker-listed homes. In contrast, other sites must establish separate data-sharing agreements with each broker, which often results in incomplete or delayed information. The difference is not just in quantity but also in quality; MLS-feeds include dozens of data fields, high-resolution photos, and real-time status updates, while broker-fed listings may offer only a basic teaser.
A common misconception is that a large percentage of homes are sold outside the MLS, particularly for-sale-by-owner (FSBO) and bank-owned foreclosures. However, based on industry assessments, the MLS captures the overwhelming majority of transactions. Even in markets known for a high rate of FSBO activity, studies have shown that over 85% of homes are sold via the MLS. Regarding foreclosures, banks typically hire brokers to list these properties in the MLS to reach the widest possible audience. For example, in a recent review of the San Diego market, a website with MLS access displayed over 6,000 listings. Of those, only 184 bank-owned properties and 120 FSBOs were sourced from outside the MLS, demonstrating that the suggestion that 30% or more of listings are missing from the MLS is a significant overstatement.
| Listing Type | Number in San Diego (Sample Data) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Total MLS Listings | 6,000+ | Direct MLS Feed |
| Bank-Owned (in MLS) | 715 | Direct MLS Feed |
| Bank-Owned (outside MLS) | 184 | Scanned from Bank Sites |
| For-Sale-by-Owner (outside MLS) | 120 | Other Channels |
Some argue that sophisticated search filters are more important than seeing every available home. While advanced filters are useful for refining a search, their value is moot if the property isn't in the database to begin with. Usage data from real estate sites indicates that the vast majority of searches—over 90% in some cases—rely on basic criteria like price, number of bedrooms, and location. The most critical filter is comprehensive data itself. Without access to the full MLS inventory, a website's filtering tools are only searching a partial picture of the market, increasing the risk a buyer will miss their ideal home.
When evaluating an online real estate platform, buyers should prioritize transparency and data sources.
The fundamental goal of any real estate search site should be market transparency. For buyers, this means starting your search on a platform that leverages the power of the MLS to ensure you are viewing the most complete and accurate information available.






