Which SUVs Have the Most Cargo Space? A Comparative Analysis of Compact, Mid-Size, and 3-Row Models

Based on independent testing of popular SUV models, the 2020 Chevrolet Traverse offers the most cargo space behind the second row at 28.55 cubic feet, while the 2019 Honda CR-V leads the compact segment with 17.21 cubic feet. However, it is crucial to note that the data presented here reflects a since-updated testing methodology and should be used as a historical reference point rather than a direct comparison to current figures.

Why Can't You Rely on Manufacturer Cargo Specs Alone?

When shopping for an SUV, cargo space is often a top priority. Manufacturer-reported cargo specifications seem like an easy way to compare models, but they are an unreliable tool due to inconsistent measurement methods across different brands. To provide a fair and realistic comparison, independent automotive reviewers often conduct their own standardized tests. This article details the findings from such tests conducted on 2019-2020 model year vehicles, offering a snapshot of how various SUVs stacked up against each other under consistent conditions. Based on our assessment experience, this hands-on approach provides a more practical understanding of usable space.

Which Compact SUVs Had the Best Cargo Capacity in 2019?

How did popular compact SUVs compare in real-world cargo volume? In a 2019 comparison test, seven models were evaluated by stacking boxes behind the second row up to the height of the seatbacks, ensuring the liftgate could close easily. This method prioritizes safe visibility while driving. The results, from highest to lowest volume, were:

Note: The tested Tiguan had an optional third row, which, even when folded, slightly reduced available height. A two-row model would likely have more space.

How Did Mid-Size, Two-Row SUVs Measure Up?

What was the cargo space situation in the mid-size SUV class? A separate test for two-row mid-size SUVs used measuring tape instead of boxes to determine volume behind the second row. Due to the different methodology, these numbers are not directly comparable to the compact SUV results above. The measurements were taken with seatbacks set to a consistent angle and cargo floors in their lowest position.

Which Three-Row SUVs Offered the Most Space Behind the Second Row?

For families needing maximum capacity, how did the larger three-row SUVs perform? This test used the same tape-measure method as the mid-size SUV challenge, allowing for a direct comparison within this group. Volume was measured behind the second row with the third row folded down.

What Are the Key Caveats When Using This Cargo Data?

When reviewing this data, keep two important points in mind. First, the final cargo scores in the original challenges incorporated additional factors like powered liftgates and easy-fold seat controls. While measured volume was the primary factor, it wasn't the only one. Second, these figures represent specific, often well-equipped, trim levels. A lower trim might have slightly different space due to the absence of components like a subwoofer. Use these volumes as a robust comparison tool, but remember that the space in the exact vehicle you're considering may vary.

To make the most informed decision, always consult the latest data from reliable sources and, most importantly, conduct a hands-on test with your own typical cargo items before purchasing.