In a comprehensive test of the three key 2016 small-engine muscle cars, the Ford Mustang EcoBoost Premium emerged as the winner, balancing daily driving comfort, performance, and technology better than the Chevrolet Camaro V-6 and Dodge Challenger V-6. Our expert evaluation, based on track performance, real-world fuel economy, and back-to-back driving assessments, awarded the Mustang 821 points, narrowly beating the Camaro (783 points) and the Challenger (780 points). For drivers seeking thrilling performance without the fuel costs of a V-8, these turbocharged and V-6 options offer an compelling alternative.
What Makes a Modern Small-Engine Muscle Car a Smart Choice?
The classic American muscle car is evolving. While V-8 power is iconic, advancements in turbocharging and V-6 efficiency mean you no longer need a large displacement engine for exciting performance. Small-engine muscle cars, like the ones tested here, deliver impressive acceleration and handling while being more affordable to fuel and easier to live with as daily drivers. This is particularly relevant when considering long-term ownership costs. Our testing included a 130-mile real-world mileage drive to assess fuel efficiency, a crucial factor for daily commuting.
How Did the 2016 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Secure Its Victory?
The 2016 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Premium won praise for its well-rounded character, blending European coupe refinement with American muscle appeal.
- Engine and Performance: The turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine (EcoBoost) delivers power smoothly and without the lag often associated with turbochargers. Judges noted its "more than enough horsepower" and confident highway passing ability. The six-speed automatic transmission was also preferred for its intuitive operation over more complex eight-speed units.
- Daily Driving Comfort: The Mustang offered the "best compromise of daily driver demeanor with performance attitude." Its ride quality, even with the optional performance package, was commended, along with a relaxed seating position and excellent visibility in all directions—a clear advantage over the Camaro.
- Technology: The updated Sync 3 infotainment system was a significant upgrade, noted for its speed and ease of use, making it the best system in the test for connecting smartphones and managing audio entertainment.
However, the Mustang had notable flaws. Several judges criticized its poor build quality, with visible body panel misalignments. The exhaust note was also panned for sounding underwhelming and lacking the traditional muscle car character.
Why Was the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 Considered a Track Star?
The 2016 Chevrolet Camaro 1LT V-6 was the performance standout, particularly for drivers who prioritize track-like handling and acceleration.
- Acceleration and Handling: The Camaro's lighter weight made it the quickest car in the test. Its 0-60 mph acceleration (a standard performance metric measuring how quickly a car can reach 60 miles per hour from a standstill) "blew the other small-engine muscle cars out of the water." The chassis tuning was described as "precise and well-balanced," elevating it into the realm of true sports cars.
- Exhaust Note: Surprisingly for a V-6, the Camaro's optional dual-mode exhaust produced a satisfying wail that convincingly mimicked a more powerful V-8 engine.
- Transmission: The eight-speed automatic transmission was judged the best in the group for its responsive behavior.
The Camaro's weaknesses were significant for daily use. The most common complaint was dramatically poor visibility, caused by a high beltline and thick windshield pillars. The interior was also criticized for feeling cramped and using low-rent materials, making it less comfortable for long journeys compared to its rivals.
How Does the 2016 Dodge Challenger V-6 Appeal as a Comfortable Cruiser?
The 2016 Dodge Challenger SXT Plus V-6 carved its niche as the comfortable, practical choice, prioritizing interior space and ride quality over sharp handling.
- Interior and Comfort: The Challenger's cabin was the clear winner, praised for its high-quality materials, excellent fit and finish, and spaciousness that can comfortably accommodate four adults. It was also the quietest and most "serene" car at highway speeds.
- Braking Performance: Despite its size, the Challenger had impressive braking power, with a confident pedal feel that outperformed the Camaro.
- Infotainment: The Uconnect system was repeatedly cited as the best infotainment system available, known for its intuitive interface and quick response times.
The trade-off for this comfort was a lack of agility. Judges found the Challenger felt "big and ponderous" on the track, with slow steering and excessive body roll in corners. The eight-speed transmission was also slow to respond during performance driving, and the high driving position was compared to that of a school bus.
Which Small-Engine Muscle Car Should You Choose?
Based on our assessment experience, the right car depends entirely on your priorities as a driver.
- Choose the 2016 Ford Mustang EcoBoost if: You want the best all-around daily driver. It offers a great blend of performance, comfort, and modern technology, making it the most versatile and easy-to-live-with choice.
- Choose the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro V-6 if: Your primary concern is maximum performance and handling. If you enjoy spirited driving on winding roads and can overlook poor visibility and a cramped interior, the Camaro delivers the most thrills.
- Choose the 2016 Dodge Challenger V-6 if: Passenger comfort and interior quality are your top priorities. As the only car that can truly seat four adults, the Challenger is ideal for long-distance cruising and for those who value a premium cabin experience above outright cornering speed.
Ultimately, the Ford Mustang EcoBoost wins this comparison by providing the most balanced package, proving that you don’t need a V-8 to enjoy a genuine, modern muscle car experience.
Share
