Share
Workplace favoritism, the practice of showing unjust preferential treatment to certain employees, undermines morale and productivity. Addressing it requires a careful, evidence-based approach, whether you are a manager, an observer, or the recipient. Left unchecked, it can lead to higher staff turnover and a toxic culture. Based on our assessment experience, successfully navigating this issue hinges on objective evaluation and professional communication.
Workplace favoritism occurs when a leader shows consistent, unwarranted preference for one employee over others, often due to a personal relationship rather than merit. This can manifest as preferential promotion opportunities, leniency with mistakes, or allocation of choice assignments. It's critical to distinguish this from legitimate performance-related recognition, where an employee receives rewards based on quantifiable achievements. Favoritism is not only unfair but can also significantly impact talent retention rates, as valued employees may leave if they perceive an unlevel playing field.
Before taking action, you must confirm that what you're observing is indeed favoritism. Ask yourself: Is there a clear, performance-based justification for the special treatment? An employee who consistently exceeds Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) may legitimately receive more opportunities.
| Legitimate Recognition | Potential Favoritism |
|---|---|
| Promotion based on exceeding sales targets by 20%. | Promotion of a friend without transparent criteria. |
| Praise for consistently high-quality project reports. | Overlooking frequent deadlines missed by a specific individual. |
| Bonus awarded per a pre-announced company policy. | Special privileges granted that are unavailable to others. |
Consult a trusted colleague to gain an outside perspective. If multiple people share the same observation, it strengthens your case and reduces the chance of a personal misinterpretation.
If you've identified a pattern of favoritism, a tactical approach is essential.
Speak Privately with Management: Schedule a confidential meeting with someone in HR or a higher-level manager—not a public confrontation. Frame the discussion around concerns for team morale and fairness, not as a personal accusation. For example, you could say, "I've noticed a pattern that seems to be affecting team cohesion, and I wanted to bring it to your attention."
Avoid Extensive Office Gossip: Venting to other colleagues can create a divisive atmosphere and undermine your professionalism. After raising your concern, allow time for management to address the situation. Remember, the favored employee may be unaware and could be embarrassed by the situation.
Reiterate Concerns if Necessary: If no change occurs, follow up calmly, stating that you haven't seen improvement. If the issue persists and involves senior leadership, you may need to consider the long-term impact on your career within that organization.
Prevention is always more effective than intervention. Managers and HR professionals can implement several strategies:
If you suspect you are receiving unearned advantages, it can damage your credibility. Address it proactively by speaking with your supervisor about your concerns. Advocate for your colleagues based on their merits, and if an unwarranted promotion is offered, request a fair, transparent review. This demonstrates integrity and earns long-term respect.
In summary, combating workplace favoritism requires a focus on objectivity and clear communication. Key actions include: documenting specific instances against performance metrics, addressing the issue privately and professionally, and advocating for structured HR processes to ensure fairness.






