Browse
Log in / Register
Share
The Dutch Colonial home at the center of the Amityville horror story stands today as a prime example of a stigmatized property—a home impacted by events unrelated to its physical condition. Despite its notorious past, the house at 108 Ocean Avenue has been continuously occupied, most recently selling for $605,000 in 2017. This case demonstrates that while a property's history can affect its value and marketability, it does not necessarily render it unsellable. For buyers, the key considerations involve understanding property disclosure laws, securing specialized financing, and assessing long-term resale potential.
A stigmatized property is one whose value is negatively affected by a psychological, rather than physical, factor. This can include events like a murder, suicide, or alleged paranormal activity occurring on the premises. Crucially, from a real estate perspective, the structural integrity of the home is not the issue. The stigma arises from perceived undesirability. In the case of the Amityville house, the 1974 murders and subsequent paranormal claims created a powerful stigma. However, as the 2017 sale price indicates, this stigma can diminish over time or be offset by other factors, such as location and property features. It is not a permanent financial sentence for the home.
Property disclosure laws vary significantly by state. These laws mandate what a seller must reveal to a potential buyer about a property's condition and history. In many states, including New York, sellers are not legally obligated to disclose that a property is stigmatized—that is, that a death, murder, or felony occurred on the premises. The rationale is that these events are not material defects affecting the home's physical structure. However, if a buyer directly asks about the property's history, the seller or their agent may be legally required to answer truthfully. Based on our experience assessment, consulting with a real estate attorney familiar with local statutes is the most reliable way to understand your specific disclosure obligations and rights.
The initial sales following the Amityville murders show a clear, though temporary, impact on value. The Lutz family purchased the home for a reduced $80,000, and the next buyers paid only $55,000. This is typical; a strong stigma often leads to a significant price reduction to attract a narrow pool of willing buyers. Furthermore, securing a mortgage for a stigmatized property can be challenging. Some lenders may be hesitant to approve a loan, fearing the property would be difficult to sell as collateral if the borrower defaults. Buyers may need to seek out portfolio lenders (institutions that hold their own loans) or be prepared to make a larger down payment to mitigate the lender's perceived risk.
| Sale Year | Buyer | Sale Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 | George & Kathy Lutz | $80,000 | Purchased ~1 year after murders |
| 1977 | Jim & Barbara Cromarty | $55,000 | Purchased before book release |
| 2017 | Kirk & Erin Hurme | $605,000 | Recent sale at market value |
For sellers, the primary challenge is managing curiosity seekers and finding a buyer who is either undeterred by the history or sees it as a unique feature. As the Cromarty family discovered, practical steps like changing the property's address can help manage privacy. For buyers, the decision is more complex. Key due diligence steps include:
The enduring story of the Amityville house confirms that a property's value is ultimately tied to tangible assets: location, structure, and market conditions. While a dark history presents unique challenges, it does not permanently condemn a home. The most critical step for any party involved in such a transaction is to seek professional legal and real estate guidance to navigate the complexities objectively.
